All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:50:59 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901031751.00076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090102203839.GA26850@elte.hu>

On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
> 
>      arch/cris
>      arch/frv
>      arch/h8300
>      arch/m32r
>      arch/m68k
>      arch/mn10300
>      arch/xtensa

Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test?  You have
to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.

> Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via 
> tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our 
> remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict resolutions 
> from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the ordering.

Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice.  As long as it ends upstream,
I'm a happy camper.

Thanks,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-03  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-01  1:19 [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-02 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-02 20:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 23:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 19:38       ` [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 20:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 21:58               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:35               ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:28                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 21:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 22:00               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 22:37                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05  1:14                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05  1:16                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 19:00                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 19:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-26 19:30                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:09                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:44                           ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                             ` <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-26 23:21                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:44                                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 17:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:58           ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  7:20     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-01-03 10:52       ` [PULL] cpumask tree Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 11:59         ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 12:19           ` [PATCH] cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fix Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:43           ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:20             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-04 12:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 14:58         ` [PULL] cpumask tree Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:31             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:52                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:09                   ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:42                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:48                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 17:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:13                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:14                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  0:23   ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-08 19:10 ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901031751.00076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.