All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Pallipadi,
	Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:37:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090103223723.GA17047@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901031347570.3179@localhost.localdomain>


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> What happened to Nick's cleanup patch to do_page_fault (a month or two 
> ago? I complained about some of the issues in his first version and 
> asked for some further cleanups, but I think that whole discussion ended 
> with him saying "I am going to add those changes that you suggested (in 
> fact, I already have)".
> 
> And then I didn't see anything further. Maybe I just missed the end 
> result. Or maybe we have it in some -mm branch or something?

they would have been in tip/x86/mm and would be upstream now had Nick 
re-sent a v2 series but that never happened. I think they might have 
fallen victim to a serious attention deficit caused by the SLQB patch ;-)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-03 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-01  1:19 [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-02 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-02 20:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 23:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 19:38       ` [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 20:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 21:58               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:35               ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:28                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 21:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 22:00               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 22:37                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-05  1:14                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05  1:16                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 19:00                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 19:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-26 19:30                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:09                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:44                           ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                             ` <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-26 23:21                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:44                                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 17:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:58           ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  7:20     ` [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-03 10:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 11:59         ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 12:19           ` [PATCH] cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fix Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:43           ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:20             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-04 12:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 14:58         ` [PULL] cpumask tree Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:31             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:52                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:09                   ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:42                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:48                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 17:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:13                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:14                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  0:23   ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-08 19:10 ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090103223723.GA17047@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.