From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:09:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495F8DCA.1060905@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090103160017.GA8920@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>> i suspect it's:
>>
>> | commit 2d22bd5e74519854458ad372a89006e65f45e628
>> | Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
>> | Date: Wed Dec 31 18:08:46 2008 -0800
>> |
>> | x86: cleanup remaining cpumask_t code in microcode_core.c
>>
>> as the microcode is loaded during CPU onlining.
>
> yep, that's the bad one. Should i revert it or do you have a safe fix in
> mind?
>
> Ingo
Probably revert for now. There are a few more following patches that also
use 'work_on_cpu' so a better (more global?) fix should be used.
Any thought on using a recursive lock for cpu-hotplug-lock? (At least for
get_online_cpus()?)
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-03 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 1:19 [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-02 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-02 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 19:38 ` [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 20:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 21:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04 3:35 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-04 4:28 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 22:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 1:16 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-26 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-26 23:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:58 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 7:20 ` [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-03 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 11:59 ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH] cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fix Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04 3:43 ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Rusty Russell
2009-01-04 4:20 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-04 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 14:58 ` [PULL] cpumask tree Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:31 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:52 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:09 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-01-03 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:48 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 0:23 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-08 19:10 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495F8DCA.1060905@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.