From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:28:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49603AE4.80809@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901041405.15096.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2009 07:26:03 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an
>>>> allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going
>>>> to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space
>>>> just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on
>>>> stack?
>>> ok, indeed testing of that is in order now.
>> Well, since I can compile a allyesconfig pretty quickly, I did the static
>> part. It looks better than it used to, and I think most of the huge stacks
>> are totally unrealted to cpu masks. But not all.
>>
>> But it looks like we have a few:
>>
>> - flush_tlb_current_task:
>> cpumask_t cpu_mask;
>> - flush_tlb_mm:
>> cpumask_t cpu_mask;
> ...
>> - acpi_cpufreq_target:
>> cpumask_t online_policy_cpus
>
> Mike? These are x86-specific...
I've been testing the heck out of it... ;-)
>
>> - local_cpus_show:
>> cpumask_t mask;
>> - local_cpulist_show:
>> cpumask_t mask;
Yes, these are in my "real soon now" patchset. Trivial.
>
> Yes, this removal is still in my queue. I'll double-check that all the
> archs have the new "cpumask_of_pcibus". (cpumask:replace-and-remove-pcibus_to_cpumask.patch "cpumask: remove the now-obsoleted pcibus_to_cpumask()").
>
>> and then we have a number of things that have "struct cpufreq_policy" on
>> the stack, and those things have two cpumask_t's in each.
>
> Yep, we have the conversion for that too. Mike, it's cpumask:convert-drivers_acpi.patch "cpumask: convert struct cpufreq_policy to cpumask_var_t."
>
That's part of what I'm testing above.
>> The rest of the high-stack-usage cases - from a _very_ quick look - seem
>> to be unrelated to CPU masks, but in the "more than 1kB of stack" group
>> about a third (wild handwaving eyeballing) of them do seem to be related
>> to cpumask.
>
> Mike was tracking this; I think he has a script to set NR_CPUS small then
> large and dump the changes.
It's looking pretty good, only 11 > 1k and 19 more > 512.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-04 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 1:19 [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-02 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-02 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 19:38 ` [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 20:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 21:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04 3:35 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-04 4:28 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-01-03 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 22:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 1:16 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-26 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-26 23:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:58 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 7:20 ` [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-03 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 11:59 ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH] cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fix Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04 3:43 ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Rusty Russell
2009-01-04 4:20 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-04 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 14:58 ` [PULL] cpumask tree Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:31 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:52 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:09 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:48 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 0:23 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-08 19:10 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49603AE4.80809@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.