All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: rate instability in wireless stack
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:24:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090105152410.GT496@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49621C36.70602@openwrt.org>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:41:58PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > With Larry's patch reverted. Rate is still at 1Mbit/s of course.
> > This is all only with rtl8180, I didn't try everything on the realtek
> > card too. 
> > 
> > -Andi
> > 
> > rate     throughput  ewma prob   this prob  this succ/attempt   success    attempts
> > TtP  1         0.9       99.2      100.0          1(  1)         23          32
> >      2         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >      5.5       0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           1
> >     11         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >      6         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >      9         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     12         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     18         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     24         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     36         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     48         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> >     54         0.0        0.0        0.0          0(  0)          0           0
> > 
> > Total packet count::    ideal 25      lookaround 1
> OK, that confirms that Larry's patch was wrong - at least the dump
> looks consistent now.
> Probably the RT2561 and the RTL8180 simply have a lower Tx power and

> thus can't get the signal through the walls as easily as the zd1211rw.

That surprises me because I use a real antenna on them which the zd1211rw
is just itself. Also some laptops with Intel wireless have no trouble
talking through the walls at full rate when I put them on the same position.

Hmm perhaps I should try to find a Windows box and see if it works
there. That would rule out hardware issues.

> If you still think that it's a rate control problem, please try all

I don't know what it is, i just know that it doesn't work and
from the evidence I gathered so far it looks like a Linux software
problem.

> the rates individually and see if one of them works better.

Forcing the rates works somewhat, but the link quality is very poor
(10-15/100) and fluctuates.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-05 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-04 16:46 rate instability in wireless stack Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 16:36 ` Michael Buesch
2009-01-04 17:41   ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05  0:29     ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05  2:53       ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05  3:55         ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05  5:02           ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05  4:59             ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05  5:48               ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05  5:51                 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05  8:17                   ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-05 12:54                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 13:32                 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 14:23                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 14:41                     ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 15:24                       ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-01-05 15:25                         ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 16:35                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 16:36                             ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 17:11                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 17:01                                 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 19:33                                   ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-01-05 20:16                                     ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05  4:22         ` Larry Finger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-07  6:46 Martín Ernesto Barreyro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090105152410.GT496@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.