From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: rate instability in wireless stack
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:11:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090105171105.GW496@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49623712.4060106@openwrt.org>
> According to the rate control's view, only the 1M has a usable
> success probability. It's rather insteresting that 11M is the only
> other rate that had some successes. With this kind of results, the
> only two options that I can think of are either a systematic tx
> status reporting error (false negative for the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK
> flag), or something PHY related.
Ok. Any more data I should provide to help tracking this down?
Do you want the same from the RaLink?
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 16:46 rate instability in wireless stack Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 16:36 ` Michael Buesch
2009-01-04 17:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 0:29 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05 2:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 3:55 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05 5:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 4:59 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05 5:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 5:51 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05 8:17 ` Johannes Berg
2009-01-05 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 13:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 14:23 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 14:41 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 15:24 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 15:25 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 16:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 16:36 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 17:11 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-01-05 17:01 ` Felix Fietkau
2009-01-05 19:33 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-01-05 20:16 ` Larry Finger
2009-01-05 4:22 ` Larry Finger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-07 6:46 Martín Ernesto Barreyro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090105171105.GW496@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.