All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:35:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119111932.GC18996@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hello, Ingo, Brian.
> > 
> > Brian Gerst wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here are the remaining patches rebased on top of these.
> > 
> > Ingo, here's git tree for kill-pda patches.
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
> > 
> > I dropped early irq_stack_ptr relocation from 0004.  I'll post updated 
> > patch as reply to the original patch.  If you think it's still 
> > necessary, please feel free to discuss it.  I also added a patch to kill 
> > PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC().  Will post the patch as a reply to 0005.
> 
> Pulled these commit into tip/core/percpu:

hm, actually - the stackprotector impact is getting quite nasty. So i 
think we are better off by merging the stackprotector fixes into 
core/percpu, and then rebasing these commits on top of that. I pushed out 
a new core/percpu branch with that done - and stackprotector works in that 
lineup.

Would you mind to redo these commits on top of that? I tried the conflict 
resolution but it looks quite complex and non-obvious - it would be 
cleaner to have it this way.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-19 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-18 16:39 [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86-64: Move irq stats from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86-64: Move TLB state " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 18:16   ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-18 23:38     ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 23:43       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:52         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86-64: Convert exception stacks " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Move cpu number from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86-64: Move current task " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86-64: Move kernelstack from PDA to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86-64: Move oldrsp " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86-64: Move irqcount " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86-64: Move nodenumber " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86-64: Move isidle " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86-64: Use absolute displacements for per-cpu accesses Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:49 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:51 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52   ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52     ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52       ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: Rework __per_cpu_load adjustments Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52           ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-64: Remove pda.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  2:46             ` [PATCH 6/6] linker script: kill PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC() Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:18           ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:52             ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  3:05               ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] x86-64: Move stack_canary into irq_stack Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 22:30       ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Tony Luck
2009-02-06 11:11         ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-06 19:06           ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-19  9:53     ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-19  2:45   ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 11:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 11:35       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-19 13:43         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  3:34           ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  7:24             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.