All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:38:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973BD73.6010001@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73c1f2160901181016t61cd1954s3ced677ab5b3b28a@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Brian.

Brian Gerst wrote:
>>    * irq_stack_ptr is not used till traps_init(), no reason to
>>      initialize it early.  On SMP, just leaving it NULL till proper
>>      initialization in setup_per_cpu_areas() works.  Dropped
>>      is_boot_cpu and early irq_stack_ptr initialization.
> 
> And it adds more #ifdefs.  All these conditional initializations on
> CONFIG_SMP are really cluttering up the code.

Yes, at the cost of removing a hidden relocation in head_64.S.  We can
also remove #ifdef there and just comment that it will be overridden
during setup_per_cpu_areas() but I think #ifdef there is better for
documentation purposes.

> It also conflicts with one of my goals with these patches: have as
> much state as possible already prepared when a cpu boots.  For the
> boot cpu this means static initialization.  For secondary cpus, that
> means setting up the values in setup_per_cpu_areas().  This
> eliminates any window where the state isn't ready yet, as you've
> already seen with per_cpu_offset.

I like the goal but it has certain dangers in the current form because
the boot cpu is using the init data area not its actual percpu area,
so each usage needs to be closely controlled till actual per cpu areas
are setup, so I think in the current form I don't think there's a good
reason to hurry initialization of variables which are not used early.
It also in a way fragments initialization paths further.  It would be
nice if boot cpu and secondary cpus can do it using the same path at
different times.

> And is_boot_cpu was a worthwhile optimization on its own.  I had plans
> on using it in more places later.

I didn't have any objection against it but with the additional
relocation removed, it looked out of place in the patch.  Please feel
free to add it back as necessary.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-18 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-18 16:39 [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86-64: Move irq stats from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86-64: Move TLB state " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 18:16   ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-18 23:38     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-01-18 23:43       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:52         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86-64: Convert exception stacks " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Move cpu number from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86-64: Move current task " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86-64: Move kernelstack from PDA to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86-64: Move oldrsp " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86-64: Move irqcount " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86-64: Move nodenumber " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86-64: Move isidle " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86-64: Use absolute displacements for per-cpu accesses Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:49 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19  0:51 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52   ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52     ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52       ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: Rework __per_cpu_load adjustments Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  0:52           ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-64: Remove pda.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  2:46             ` [PATCH 6/6] linker script: kill PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC() Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:18           ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:52             ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19  3:05               ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-19  2:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] x86-64: Move stack_canary into irq_stack Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 22:30       ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Tony Luck
2009-02-06 11:11         ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-06 19:06           ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-19  9:53     ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-19  2:45   ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 11:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 11:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 13:43         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  3:34           ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20  7:24             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4973BD73.6010001@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.