From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:05:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73c1f2160901181852q1c063011lf9d4588ce9a19dd1@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Brian.
Brian Gerst wrote:
>> As discussed before, the above chunks do drop one #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> but it does add a obscure relocation and please note that it's
>> different from early_gdt_descr. early_gdt_descr is needed to bring up
>> the cpu so there's no other way to do it but to relocate it in
>> assembly. If you absolutely have to relocate irq_stack_ptr early,
>> please do it in C code in head64.c but then again irq_stack_ptr is not
>> even necessary till traps_init() which is way after per cpu area
>> setup. So, the above two chunks are not necessary && even if they go
>> in, they don't have much to do with this patch.
>
> I'll give you that this particular variable doesn't need early
> adjustment currently. I'd prefer if you left the ifdef off the first
> hunk, though. A comment will suffice to document that the initial
> value is going to be overwritten later on SMP.
Yeah, maybe. I don't know. If we ever get to a point where we can
fully initialize per cpu area for cpu0, things like this can probably
go away, but for now, I just thought it would be better to make it
clear that UP and SMP are taking different initialization paths &&
that was how the code looked like before this patch, so... But no big
deal one way or another, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-19 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 16:39 [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86-64: Move irq stats from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86-64: Move TLB state " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 18:16 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-18 23:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 23:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 0:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86-64: Convert exception stacks " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: Move cpu number from PDA to per-cpu and consolidate with 32-bit Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86-64: Move current task " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86-64: Move kernelstack from PDA to per-cpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86-64: Move oldrsp " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86-64: Move irqcount " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86-64: Move nodenumber " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86-64: Move isidle " Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86-64: Use absolute displacements for per-cpu accesses Tejun Heo
2009-01-18 16:49 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 0:51 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: Rework __per_cpu_load adjustments Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 0:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86-64: Remove pda.h Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 2:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] linker script: kill PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC() Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86-64: Remove the PDA Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 2:52 ` Brian Gerst
2009-01-19 3:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-01-19 2:46 ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] x86-64: Move stack_canary into irq_stack Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu: Refactor percpu.h Tony Luck
2009-02-06 11:11 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-06 19:06 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-19 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86-64: Remove pda_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-19 2:45 ` [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20 3:34 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4973EE03.2060106@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.