All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:23:59 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417122359.GA6707@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bpr71p1o.fsf_-_@macbook.be.48ers.dk>

Hi Peter,

Sorry for the late response (and don't hesitate to ping me if I
don't answer, some things get lost in my inbox traffic, sorry).

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Anton> The advantages of this:
>  Anton> - Don't encourage legacy support;
>  Anton> - Less external symbols, less code to compile-in for !MPC832x_RDB
>  Anton>   platforms.
> 
> It's nice with your cleanups, but I wonder how to handle more
> complicated chip select handling than simply toggling a single gpio.
> 
> I have a board (or 2 actually, but they are similar in this regard)
> with a mpc8347 using SPI to a number of addon boards. For signal
> integrity reasons the SPI signals are routed to a MUX, so the chip
> select logic has to set the MUX in addition to controlling the CS line
> of the device.

So that's just a bit complicated GPIO controller. I believe you
should describe it in the device tree and use it's muxed lines as
usual GPIOs.

Something ling

muxed_pio: gpio-controller@.. {
	#gpio-cells = <2>;
	compatible = "..,<board>-muxed-gpios";
	reg = <...>;
	gpios = <...>; <- specify pure BLK1, BLK2, OPT1, OPT2 GPIOs
	gpio-controller;
};

And then,

> I've been using code like this since late 2007, but this patch
> ofcourse breaks it:
> 
> static void thinx_spi_activate_cs(u8 cs, u8 polarity)
> {
> 	static u8 old_cs = 255;
> 
> 	if (cs != old_cs) {
> 		/* mux setup (cs 2:1)*/
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 1);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL0, cs&2);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL1, cs&4);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 0);
> 		old_cs = cs;
> 	}
> 
> 	switch (cs) {
> 	case 0: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL1, polarity); break;
> 	case 1: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL2, polarity); break;
> 	case 2: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT1, polarity); break;
> 	case 3: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT2, polarity); break;
> 	}
> }

^^^ Put this logic into the "<board>-muxed-gpios" GPIO controller
driver.

Then spi node would look like this:

spi-controller@.. {
	...
	gpios = <&muxed_pio cs1 0   /* muxed CS_BLK1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs2 0   /* muxed CS_BLK2 */
		 &muxed_pio cs3 0   /* muxed CS_OPT1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs4 0>; /* muxed CS_OPT2 */
};

Hope this helps,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:23:59 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417122359.GA6707@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bpr71p1o.fsf_-_@macbook.be.48ers.dk>

Hi Peter,

Sorry for the late response (and don't hesitate to ping me if I
don't answer, some things get lost in my inbox traffic, sorry).

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Anton> The advantages of this:
>  Anton> - Don't encourage legacy support;
>  Anton> - Less external symbols, less code to compile-in for !MPC832x_RDB
>  Anton>   platforms.
> 
> It's nice with your cleanups, but I wonder how to handle more
> complicated chip select handling than simply toggling a single gpio.
> 
> I have a board (or 2 actually, but they are similar in this regard)
> with a mpc8347 using SPI to a number of addon boards. For signal
> integrity reasons the SPI signals are routed to a MUX, so the chip
> select logic has to set the MUX in addition to controlling the CS line
> of the device.

So that's just a bit complicated GPIO controller. I believe you
should describe it in the device tree and use it's muxed lines as
usual GPIOs.

Something ling

muxed_pio: gpio-controller@.. {
	#gpio-cells = <2>;
	compatible = "..,<board>-muxed-gpios";
	reg = <...>;
	gpios = <...>; <- specify pure BLK1, BLK2, OPT1, OPT2 GPIOs
	gpio-controller;
};

And then,

> I've been using code like this since late 2007, but this patch
> ofcourse breaks it:
> 
> static void thinx_spi_activate_cs(u8 cs, u8 polarity)
> {
> 	static u8 old_cs = 255;
> 
> 	if (cs != old_cs) {
> 		/* mux setup (cs 2:1)*/
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 1);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL0, cs&2);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL1, cs&4);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 0);
> 		old_cs = cs;
> 	}
> 
> 	switch (cs) {
> 	case 0: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL1, polarity); break;
> 	case 1: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL2, polarity); break;
> 	case 2: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT1, polarity); break;
> 	case 3: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT2, polarity); break;
> 	}
> }

^^^ Put this logic into the "<board>-muxed-gpios" GPIO controller
driver.

Then spi node would look like this:

spi-controller@.. {
	...
	gpios = <&muxed_pio cs1 0   /* muxed CS_BLK1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs2 0   /* muxed CS_BLK2 */
		 &muxed_pio cs3 0   /* muxed CS_OPT1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs4 0>; /* muxed CS_OPT2 */
};

Hope this helps,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-17 18:59 [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/83xx: Move gianfar mdio nodes under the ethernet nodes Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 13:21 ` Kumar Gala
2009-03-18 15:28   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 15:43     ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 15:50       ` Grant Likely
2009-03-19  1:20       ` David Gibson
2009-03-18 19:59     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:00       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] powerpc/83xx: Add power management support for MPC837x boards Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:00       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] powerpc/83xx: Move gianfar mdio nodes under the ethernet nodes Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:00       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc/85xx: " Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:05         ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 20:23           ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:27             ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 20:29             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:31               ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 20:33                 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:35                   ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 20:39                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:46                       ` Scott Wood
2009-03-18 21:00                         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 20:00       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] powerpc/86xx: " Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-08  9:18         ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-08  9:18           ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-17  5:13           ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-17  5:13             ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-17 12:23           ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-04-17 12:23             ` Anton Vorontsov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-05 20:09 [PATCH 0/7] OpenFirmware support for the spi_mpc83xx driver Anton Vorontsov
     [not found] ` <20081205200936.GA19137-wnGakbxT3iijyJ0x5qLZdcN33GVbZNy3@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 1/7] powerpc: Implement get_brgfreq() and get_baudrate() stubs Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-16 18:24     ` Kumar Gala
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 2/7] spi_mpc83xx: Fix sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 3/7] spi_mpc83xx: Rework chip selects handling Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 4/7] spi_mpc83xx: Add OF platform driver bindings Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 6/7] powerpc: Add mmc-spi-slot bindings Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10   ` [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/83xx: Add mmc-spi support via the device tree for MPC8323E-RDB Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-05 20:10     ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-18 18:33   ` [PATCH 0/7] OpenFirmware support for the spi_mpc83xx driver Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-18 18:33     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-07  4:28   ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-07  4:28     ` Kumar Gala
     [not found]     ` <6DC0606C-1CDA-4549-8A63-E3F86010291B-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-23 19:49       ` [PATCH resend 0/6] " Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:49         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:49         ` Anton Vorontsov
     [not found]         ` <20090123194958.GA17355-wnGakbxT3iijyJ0x5qLZdcN33GVbZNy3@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 1/6] spi_mpc83xx: Fix sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 2/6] spi_mpc83xx: Rework chip selects handling Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 3/6] spi_mpc83xx: Add OF platform driver bindings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: Add mmc-spi-slot bindings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/83xx: Add mmc-spi support via the device tree for MPC8323E-RDB Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50           ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-09 16:53           ` [PATCH resend 0/6] OpenFirmware support for the spi_mpc83xx driver Kumar Gala
2009-03-09 16:53             ` Kumar Gala
2009-03-09 16:53             ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090417122359.GA6707@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.