From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
Andrei Tanas <andrei@tanas.ca>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>, Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:02:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909120218.GB21829@arachsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090907115927.GU8710@arachsys.com>
Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> writes:
> I've also noticed that during this recovery, I'm seeing lots of timeouts but
> they don't seem to interrupt the resync:
>
> 05:47:39 ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
> 05:47:39 ata5.00: cmd ec/00:01:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 pio 512 in
> 05:47:39 res 40/00:00:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> 05:47:39 ata5.00: status: { DRDY }
> 05:47:39 ata5: hard resetting link
> 05:47:49 ata5: softreset failed (device not ready)
> 05:47:49 ata5: hard resetting link
> 05:47:49 ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> 05:47:49 ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
> 05:47:49 ata5: EH complete
>
> 08:17:39 ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
> 08:17:39 ata5.00: cmd ec/00:01:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 pio 512 in
> 08:17:39 res 40/00:00:35:83:f8/00:00:4d:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> 08:17:39 ata5.00: status: { DRDY }
> 08:17:39 ata5: hard resetting link
> 08:17:49 ata5: softreset failed (device not ready)
> 08:17:49 ata5: hard resetting link
> 08:17:49 ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> 08:17:49 ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
> 08:17:49 ata5: EH complete
>
> 10:22:39 ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
> 10:22:39 ata5.00: cmd ec/00:01:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 pio 512 in
> 10:22:39 res 40/00:00:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> 10:22:39 ata5.00: status: { DRDY }
> 10:22:39 ata5: hard resetting link
> 10:22:49 ata5: softreset failed (device not ready)
> 10:22:49 ata5: hard resetting link
> 10:22:50 ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> 10:22:51 ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
> 10:22:51 ata5: EH complete
... the difference being that a timeout which causes a super_written failure
seems to return an I/O error whereas the others don't:
ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
ata5.00: cmd ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata5.00: status: { DRDY }
ata5: hard resetting link
ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata5: EH complete
end_request: I/O error, dev sde, sector 1465147272
md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
raid10: Disk failure on sde3, disabling device.
I wonder what's different about these two timeouts such that one causes an I/O
error and the other just causes a retry after reset? Presumably if the latter
was also just a retry, everything would be (closer to being) fine.
Cheers,
Chris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-26 0:32 MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935? Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 0:50 ` NeilBrown
2009-08-26 1:06 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-26 1:24 ` NeilBrown
2009-08-26 1:31 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-26 2:22 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 2:41 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-26 3:45 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 10:34 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-26 14:46 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 14:49 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 15:39 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-26 18:12 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-26 18:12 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 0:07 ` Mark Lord
2009-08-27 1:37 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 1:37 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 2:33 ` Robert Hancock
2009-08-27 21:22 ` MD/RAID time out writing superblock Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 21:57 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-31 8:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-31 12:04 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-31 12:20 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-07 11:44 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-07 11:59 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-09 12:02 ` Chris Webb [this message]
2009-09-14 7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 7:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 12:48 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-14 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 14:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-16 23:19 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 13:29 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 13:32 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 13:37 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 16:16 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 16:17 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-18 17:05 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-20 17:35 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-28 5:32 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-21 10:26 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-21 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-22 6:16 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-20 18:36 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-14 13:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 14:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 14:34 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 13:14 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-09-07 16:55 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-07 23:26 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-07 23:26 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-14 7:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 21:13 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-14 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-07 16:55 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-16 22:28 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-16 23:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-17 12:00 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 11:57 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 16:36 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-18 0:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-18 2:47 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-18 17:07 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-20 18:46 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-21 0:02 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-09-17 13:35 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 15:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-31 12:21 ` Mark Lord
2009-08-31 23:45 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-01 13:07 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-01 13:07 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-01 13:15 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-01 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-01 13:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-01 14:18 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-01 14:18 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-14 5:30 ` Marc Giger
2009-09-14 5:30 ` Marc Giger
2009-09-02 21:58 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-04 19:39 ` Andrei Tanas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909120218.GB21829@arachsys.com \
--to=chris@arachsys.com \
--cc=andrei@tanas.ca \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.