All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
@ 2009-09-09 14:55 Boris Derzhavets
  2009-09-09 19:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Boris Derzhavets @ 2009-09-09 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge, xen-devel, fedora-xen


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3158 bytes --]

>I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-rc8
>boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please
>and also 'lspci -vvv' output?

If i built rc8 on F11 ( dual booting) with F12 and install kernel and modules via

# mount /dev/mapper/serverfedora11-lv_root /mnt
#cd  /mnt/usr/src/linux-2.6-xen
# make modules_install install

in F12 env, then  i get a stable kernel rc8 on F12.

  If i compile and and install on F12 kernel has stack trace and is pretty unstable at
runtime. 

Now i am  sending  two  dmesg reports :-
1. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F11 and installed on F12 
dmesg.log.gz  (clean)
 2. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F12 and installed on F12 
dmesg.1.gz ( stack trace here) 
"lspci -vvv"  report has been also sent to you per your request, but i will repeat. This one is for C2D   E8400   box.

Boris.


--- On Wed, 9/9/09, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 10:10 AM

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:19:20AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12.
> Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed
> on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1. 
> Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong's 'rc7.git4'  kernel for F12.

I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-rc8
boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please
and also 'lspci -vvv' output?

> 
> Boris.
> 
> --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable, stacktrace with >4096M of dom0_mem
> To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad..wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:45 PM
> 
> Dmesg log for rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 on F12 rawhide attached.

I took a look at the dmesg and it looks fine. I did not see a stack trace in it?

Maybe I was looking at the wrong one. This is the identifying timestamp at the beginning:
Linux version 2.6.31-rc8 (root@ServerXen35) (gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC) ) #3 SMP Tue Sep 8 04:24:43 EDT 2009

is that the right dmesg?

***************************************************
Yes , this one is fine.
Kernel had been built on F11 and installed on F12
***************************************************

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



      

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4589 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: dmesg.log.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 11693 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: dmesg.1.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 15354 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: lspci.vvv.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 4008 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
@ 2009-09-09  7:19 Boris Derzhavets
  2009-09-09 14:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Boris Derzhavets @ 2009-09-09  7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pasi Kärkkäinen, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge, xen-devel, fedora-xen


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2487 bytes --]

Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12.
Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed
on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1. 
Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong's 'rc7.git4'  kernel for F12.

Boris.

--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable, stacktrace with >4096M of dom0_mem
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fedora-xen@redhat.com
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:45 PM

Dmesg log for rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 on F12 rawhide attached.

Boris.

--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable, stacktrace with >4096M of dom0_mem
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, fedora-xen@redhat.com
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:34 PM

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:46PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:14:54PM -0700, Boris
 Derzhavets wrote:
> > Console drops into the same stack trace in  both cases.
> > 
> 
> Jeremy: Any ideas could some recent change in pv_ops dom0 kernel cause
> usb stuff to stop working with >4096M of dom0 memory? 

The last set of changes in Jeremy's kernel are a set of patches I sent,
so the problem is most likely caused by my work.

A dmesg from both Xen and Linux kernel would be most helpfull. Also
a lspci -vvv would be nice.

And as Pasi suggested, booting the same kernel without Xen would
be most helpful.


> 
> dom0_mem=4096M works
> dom0_mem=4097M fails with stacktrace
> 
> Boris: What was the last kernel that worked without backtraces? 
> Also, does that same kernel work as baremetal (without Xen) ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



      
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen



      

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3765 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: dmesg.1.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 15354 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-09 20:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-09 14:55 Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12 Boris Derzhavets
2009-09-09 19:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-09-09 20:02   ` Boris Derzhavets
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-09  7:19 Boris Derzhavets
2009-09-09 14:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.