All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:22:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112222200.GA19109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEF3143.2030701@sgi.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:21:39AM -0800, Mike Travis wrote:
 
 > >>     [   90.981402] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
 > >>     [   90.985888] CPU: L2 cache: 256K
 > >>     [   90.988032] CPU: L3 cache: 24576K
 > > 
 > > I would recommend to drop the cache information; this can be easily
 > > gotten at runtime and is often implied in the CPU name anyways
 > > (and especially L1 and increasingly L2 too change only very rarely)
 > 
 > Ok, though because of future system upgrades to a UV system, you can
 > end up with slightly different processors (of the same family).  The
 > only differences I've detected so far in testing is the stepping has
 > changed.

I happened to be annoyed by dozens of these three printk's earlier,
and hacked up the following (currently untested) patch.

But I don't disagree with Andi either, that it's not particularly useful,
and we can get all this from userspace in /proc/cpuinfo, or x86info.

If someone still finds it valuable to have the kernel keep printing it
though, perhaps something like the following ?

	Dave



On processors with a large number of cores, we print dozens of lines of information about
the CPU cache topology, most of which is unnecessary.
This patch reduces spew a lot (down to a single line unless someone uses a mix of processors
with different cache sizes)

- Check if the total cache size on APs is equal to the boot processors cache size.
  Print nothing if equal.
- The three printk's will fit on one line.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index 804c40e..cc4f44d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -358,9 +362,9 @@ unsigned int __cpuinit init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
 	unsigned int cpu = c->cpu_index;
 #endif
+	static int is_initialized;
 
 	if (c->cpuid_level > 3) {
-		static int is_initialized;
 
 		if (is_initialized == 0) {
 			/* Init num_cache_leaves from boot CPU */
@@ -488,6 +492,21 @@ unsigned int __cpuinit init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 #endif
 	}
 
+	c->x86_cache_size = l3 ? l3 : (l2 ? l2 : (l1i+l1d));
+
+	/*
+	 * cache topology on all AP's is likely equal to that of the BP
+	 * if this is the case, don't bother printing anything out for the AP's.
+	 */
+	if (is_initialized != 0) {
+		if (c->x86_cache_size == boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size)
+			return l2;
+		else
+			printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: AP has different cache size (%d) to BP (%d)\n",
+				c->x86_cache_size,
+				boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size);
+	}
+
 	if (trace)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Trace cache: %dK uops", trace);
 	else if (l1i)
@@ -495,16 +512,12 @@ unsigned int __cpuinit init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
 	if (l1d)
 		printk(KERN_CONT ", L1 D cache: %dK\n", l1d);
-	else
-		printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
 
 	if (l2)
-		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: L2 cache: %dK\n", l2);
+		printk(KERN_CONT ", L2 cache: %dK\n", l2);
 
 	if (l3)
-		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: L3 cache: %dK\n", l3);
-
-	c->x86_cache_size = l3 ? l3 : (l2 ? l2 : (l1i+l1d));
+		printk(KERN_CONT ", L3 cache: %dK\n", l3);
 
 	return l2;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-12 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com>
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Add limit console output function Mike Travis
2009-10-24  1:09   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 17:55     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 14:15       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26  7:02   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 16:10     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:05       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:03     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 21:55       ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 22:07         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:25         ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:54           ` David Rientjes
2009-10-30 20:39             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 23:30               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31  0:27                 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 11:11           ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-02 19:21             ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 19:34               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 20:32                 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04  0:22                   ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 10:24                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-04 10:31                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 22:22               ` Dave Jones [this message]
2009-11-12 22:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-12 23:15                   ` Dave Jones
2009-11-13  8:03                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13  8:11                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-13  8:18                     ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove the CPU cache size printk's tip-bot for Dave Jones
2009-11-13 22:38                     ` [PATCH] x86: Remove CPU cache size output for non-Intel too Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 22:52                       ` Dave Jones
2009-11-14  0:54                       ` [tip:x86/debug] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 16:10                   ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-14  0:53                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:26   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:04   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:08     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:24     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 19:45       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:00         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:25           ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:42             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:48               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 23:02                 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28  3:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  3:53                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-28  4:08                   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:55             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 21:06               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:10                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-28  3:32             ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  4:11                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:53                   ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2009-10-28  5:19                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  5:24                       ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:08                     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 21:42                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-10 21:57                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 23:09                         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:56                         ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:14                           ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:20                             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 17:02                   ` [patch] " Mike Travis
2009-10-28 20:52                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:03                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:06                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:35                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:46                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 22:36                           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29  8:21                             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 16:34                               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 19:06                                 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:16         ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 20:23           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:33             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of ACPI messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24  3:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-26 18:15     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 22:47     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-10-26 21:25       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:27     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:51       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of firmware messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 20:09   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-24 21:09     ` Tigran Aivazian
2009-10-24 22:45       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-25 16:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-25 17:11           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-25 17:27             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 18:33               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 20:11             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-27 15:21               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:25         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 19:27           ` Borislav Petkov
2009-10-30 19:40         ` [PATCH] x86_64: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:24       ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:18     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:05   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of cpu is down messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091112222200.GA19109@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.