All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Hannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:24:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE5E95A.9050508@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0910242207180.2439@ginsburg.homenet>



Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>> -       printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, 
>>> revision=0x%x\n",
>>> +       if (cpu_num < 4 || !limit_console_output(false))
>>> +               printk(KERN_INFO
>>> +                       "microcode: CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, 
>>> revision=0x%x\n",
>>>                        cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, I guess we wouldn't lose a lot by simply removing those messages
>> completely. Per-cpu pf/revision is available via /sys anyway.
> 
> The reason for printing them is that the pf (possibly others?) can 
> change by the update and so the log has this info handy.
> 
> Kind regards
> Tigran

Is there any reason to need this on the console before being able to
look at them with dmesg?  (Or use some filter program to hunt through
the system log?)

And if all the cpus are the same, would the printing of each one give
you any more information?  I could add something that attempts to
print the new line if it's different than the previous, but this would
add complexity, maybe unnecessarily?   And I was going for an approach
that optimizes to zero code when not enabled.

Thanks,
Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com>
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Add limit console output function Mike Travis
2009-10-24  1:09   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 17:55     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 14:15       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26  7:02   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 16:10     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:05       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:03     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 21:55       ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 22:07         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:25         ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:54           ` David Rientjes
2009-10-30 20:39             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 23:30               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31  0:27                 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 11:11           ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-02 19:21             ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 19:34               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 20:32                 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04  0:22                   ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 10:24                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-04 10:31                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 22:22               ` Dave Jones
2009-11-12 22:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-12 23:15                   ` Dave Jones
2009-11-13  8:03                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13  8:11                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-13  8:18                     ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove the CPU cache size printk's tip-bot for Dave Jones
2009-11-13 22:38                     ` [PATCH] x86: Remove CPU cache size output for non-Intel too Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 22:52                       ` Dave Jones
2009-11-14  0:54                       ` [tip:x86/debug] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 16:10                   ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-14  0:53                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:26   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:04   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:08     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:24     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 19:45       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:00         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:25           ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:42             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:48               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 23:02                 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28  3:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  3:53                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-28  4:08                   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:55             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 21:06               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:10                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-28  3:32             ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  4:11                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:53                   ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2009-10-28  5:19                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  5:24                       ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:08                     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 21:42                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-10 21:57                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 23:09                         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:56                         ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:14                           ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:20                             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 17:02                   ` [patch] " Mike Travis
2009-10-28 20:52                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:03                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:06                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:35                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:46                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 22:36                           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29  8:21                             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 16:34                               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 19:06                                 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:16         ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 20:23           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:33             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of ACPI messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24  3:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-26 18:15     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 22:47     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-10-26 21:25       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:27     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:51       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of firmware messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 20:09   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-24 21:09     ` Tigran Aivazian
2009-10-24 22:45       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-25 16:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-25 17:11           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-25 17:27             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 18:33               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 20:11             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-27 15:21               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:25         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 19:27           ` Borislav Petkov
2009-10-30 19:40         ` [PATCH] x86_64: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:24       ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-10-26 18:18     ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:05   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of cpu is down messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE5E95A.9050508@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@hanneseder.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.