From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:10:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFD84E9.1010908@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFC92DD.3020105@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 02:22 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> But I don't disagree with Andi either, that it's not particularly useful,
>> and we can get all this from userspace in /proc/cpuinfo, or x86info.
>>
>
> I personally don't think it's useful at all. It gives information about
> the processor which can be obtained from other sources. What we want is
> enough information that the CPU can be unambiguously identified, so that
> when someone posts dmesg we can tell what machine they came from.
>
> -hpa
Can we say the same thing about the sched debug messages? It's even more
painful because the number of lines output is exponential to the number
of cpus.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com>
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Add limit console output function Mike Travis
2009-10-24 1:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 17:55 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 14:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 7:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 16:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:05 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:03 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 21:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 22:07 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:25 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-30 20:39 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 23:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31 0:27 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 11:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-02 19:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 20:32 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 0:22 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 10:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-04 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 22:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-12 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-12 23:15 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-13 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 8:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-13 8:18 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove the CPU cache size printk's tip-bot for Dave Jones
2009-11-13 22:38 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove CPU cache size output for non-Intel too Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 22:52 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-14 0:54 ` [tip:x86/debug] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 16:10 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-14 0:53 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:04 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:08 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:24 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 19:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:00 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:25 ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:42 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 23:02 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 3:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 3:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-28 3:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 4:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:53 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2009-10-28 5:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 5:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 21:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-10 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 23:09 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:20 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 17:02 ` [patch] " Mike Travis
2009-10-28 20:52 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:03 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:35 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:46 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 22:36 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 8:21 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 16:34 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 19:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 20:23 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of ACPI messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 3:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-26 18:15 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 22:47 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-10-26 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:27 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of firmware messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 20:09 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-24 21:09 ` Tigran Aivazian
2009-10-24 22:45 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-25 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-25 17:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-25 17:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 18:33 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 20:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-27 15:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:25 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 19:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-10-30 19:40 ` [PATCH] x86_64: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:18 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:34 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of cpu is down messages Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFD84E9.1010908@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.