From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:02:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE77BF6.2040201@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910271345400.9183@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Mike Travis wrote:
>
>> I applied your previous patch with the change to use static and
>> here's the console output from a live system:
>>
>>
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC {0-7,16-23} -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC {32-39,48-55} -> Node 1
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> APIC {64-71,80-87} -> Node 2
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 3 -> APIC {96-103,112-119} -> Node 3
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 4 -> APIC {128-135,144-151} -> Node 4
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 5 -> APIC {160-167,176-183} -> Node 5
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 6 -> APIC {192-199,208-215} -> Node 6
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 7 -> APIC {224-231,240-247} -> Node 7
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 8 -> APIC {256-263,272-279} -> Node 8
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 9 -> APIC {288-295,304-311} -> Node 9
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 10 -> APIC {320-327,336-343} -> Node 10
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 11 -> APIC {352-359,368-375} -> Node 11
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 12 -> APIC {384-391,400-407} -> Node 12
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 13 -> APIC {416-423,432-439} -> Node 13
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 14 -> APIC {448-455,464-471} -> Node 14
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 15 -> APIC {480-487,496-503} -> Node 15
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 16 -> APIC {512-519,528-535} -> Node 16
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 17 -> APIC {544-551,560-567} -> Node 17
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 18 -> APIC {576-583,592-599} -> Node 18
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 19 -> APIC {608-615,624-631} -> Node 19
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 20 -> APIC {640-647,656-663} -> Node 20
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 21 -> APIC {672-679,688-695} -> Node 21
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 22 -> APIC {704-711,720-727} -> Node 22
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 23 -> APIC {736-743,752-759} -> Node 23
>>
>
> Quite the system you have there :) What was once 760 lines has been
> reduced to 24 without removing any information.
>
> This seems to be the most we can reduce this particular output since we
> don't support mapping multiple pxms to a single node.
Yes, thanks very much for the optimization.
(And you can add my Acked-by or whatever you need.)
Tomorrow I will have more time on the system and will try out all the
new changes together, mostly with summarizing the Processor stats.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com>
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Add limit console output function Mike Travis
2009-10-24 1:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 17:55 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 14:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-26 7:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 16:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:05 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-26 18:03 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 21:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 22:07 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:25 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-10-30 19:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-30 20:39 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-30 23:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-31 0:27 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 11:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-02 19:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-02 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 20:32 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 0:22 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-04 10:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-04 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 22:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-12 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-12 23:15 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-13 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 8:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-13 8:18 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove the CPU cache size printk's tip-bot for Dave Jones
2009-11-13 22:38 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove CPU cache size output for non-Intel too Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 22:52 ` Dave Jones
2009-11-14 0:54 ` [tip:x86/debug] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-11-13 16:10 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-14 0:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:04 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:08 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:24 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 19:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:00 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:25 ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:42 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 23:02 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-10-28 3:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 3:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-28 3:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 4:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:53 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2009-10-28 5:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 5:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-10 21:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 21:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-10 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 23:09 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:20 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 17:02 ` [patch] " Mike Travis
2009-10-28 20:52 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:03 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:35 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:46 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 22:36 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 8:21 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 16:34 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 19:06 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 20:23 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of ACPI messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 3:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-26 18:15 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 22:47 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-10-26 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:27 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 15:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of firmware messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages Mike Travis
2009-10-24 20:09 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-24 21:09 ` Tigran Aivazian
2009-10-24 22:45 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-25 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-25 17:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-25 17:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 18:33 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:29 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 20:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-10-27 15:21 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:25 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 19:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-10-30 19:40 ` [PATCH] x86_64: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: " Mike Travis
2009-10-26 18:18 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-26 7:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-26 18:34 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of cpu is down messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 [PATCH 0/7] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:48 ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-11-13 9:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 10:02 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 10:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 18:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-20 18:58 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE77BF6.2040201@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.