All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: Introduce chip addition/removal notifier
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:28:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126172824.GA20319@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001252234.30169.david-b@pacbell.net>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:34:29PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > 
> > +config GPIOLIB_NOTIFIER
> > +       bool
> > +       help
> > +         This symbol is selected by subsystems that need to handle GPIO
> > +         chips addition and removal. E.g., this is used for the
> > +         OpenFirmware bindings.
> > +
> 
> I'm no huge fan of notifiers, but I suppose they have their place.
> 
> However ... I don't see a lot of win to making this optional.

OK, will remove it.

> Just
> inline the little two blocking_notifier_call_chain() calls directly,
> making this a *LOT* simpler.

I'd rather stay with gpio_call_chain() helper, it makes the code
a little bit prettier, IMO. Compare this:

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1103,6 +1107,9 @@ fail:
 		pr_err("gpiochip_add: gpios %d..%d (%s) not registered\n",
 			chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
 			chip->label ? : "generic");
+	else
+		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier,
+					     GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_ADDED, chip);
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
@@ -1119,6 +1126,13 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	int		status = 0;
 	unsigned	id;
 
+	/* Ask external subsystems to release the chip. */
+	status = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier,
+					      GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_REMOVE, chip);
+	status = notifier_to_errno(status);
+	if (status)
+		return status;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {

--- 

With the call_chain helper:

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1029,6 +1030,16 @@ static inline void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS */
 
+static int gpio_call_chain(struct gpio_chip *chip, enum gpio_notify_msg msg)
+{
+	int ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier, msg, chip);
+
+	return notifier_to_errno(ret);
+}
+
 /**
  * gpiochip_add() - register a gpio_chip
  * @chip: the chip to register, with chip->base initialized
@@ -1103,6 +1114,9 @@ fail:
 		pr_err("gpiochip_add: gpios %d..%d (%s) not registered\n",
 			chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
 			chip->label ? : "generic");
+	else
+		gpio_call_chain(chip, GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_ADDED);
+
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
@@ -1119,6 +1133,11 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	int		status = 0;
 	unsigned	id;
 
+	/* Ask external subsystems to release the chip. */
+	status = gpio_call_chain(chip, GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_REMOVE);
+	if (status)
+		return status;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
--- 

Thanks!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: Introduce chip addition/removal notifier
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:28:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126172824.GA20319@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001252234.30169.david-b@pacbell.net>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:34:29PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > 
> > +config GPIOLIB_NOTIFIER
> > +       bool
> > +       help
> > +         This symbol is selected by subsystems that need to handle GPIO
> > +         chips addition and removal. E.g., this is used for the
> > +         OpenFirmware bindings.
> > +
> 
> I'm no huge fan of notifiers, but I suppose they have their place.
> 
> However ... I don't see a lot of win to making this optional.

OK, will remove it.

> Just
> inline the little two blocking_notifier_call_chain() calls directly,
> making this a *LOT* simpler.

I'd rather stay with gpio_call_chain() helper, it makes the code
a little bit prettier, IMO. Compare this:

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1103,6 +1107,9 @@ fail:
 		pr_err("gpiochip_add: gpios %d..%d (%s) not registered\n",
 			chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
 			chip->label ? : "generic");
+	else
+		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier,
+					     GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_ADDED, chip);
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
@@ -1119,6 +1126,13 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	int		status = 0;
 	unsigned	id;
 
+	/* Ask external subsystems to release the chip. */
+	status = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier,
+					      GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_REMOVE, chip);
+	status = notifier_to_errno(status);
+	if (status)
+		return status;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {

--- 

With the call_chain helper:

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1029,6 +1030,16 @@ static inline void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS */
 
+static int gpio_call_chain(struct gpio_chip *chip, enum gpio_notify_msg msg)
+{
+	int ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&gpio_notifier, msg, chip);
+
+	return notifier_to_errno(ret);
+}
+
 /**
  * gpiochip_add() - register a gpio_chip
  * @chip: the chip to register, with chip->base initialized
@@ -1103,6 +1114,9 @@ fail:
 		pr_err("gpiochip_add: gpios %d..%d (%s) not registered\n",
 			chip->base, chip->base + chip->ngpio - 1,
 			chip->label ? : "generic");
+	else
+		gpio_call_chain(chip, GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_ADDED);
+
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
@@ -1119,6 +1133,11 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	int		status = 0;
 	unsigned	id;
 
+	/* Ask external subsystems to release the chip. */
+	status = gpio_call_chain(chip, GPIO_NOTIFY_CHIP_REMOVE);
+	if (status)
+		return status;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
--- 

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-26 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-25 18:09 [PATCH 0/4] OF GPIO integration for I2C/SPI GPIO chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:09 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: Introduce chip addition/removal notifier Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26  6:34   ` David Brownell
2010-01-26  6:34     ` David Brownell
2010-01-26 17:28     ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-01-26 17:28       ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26 21:01       ` David Brownell
2010-01-26 21:01         ` David Brownell
2010-01-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] of/gpio: Add support for two-stage registration for the of_gpio_chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26  6:36   ` David Brownell
2010-01-26  6:36     ` David Brownell
2010-01-26 17:43     ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26 17:43       ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26 21:02       ` David Brownell
2010-01-26 21:02         ` David Brownell
2010-01-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/mcu_mpc8349emitx: Remove OF GPIO handling stuff Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-26  6:43   ` David Brownell
2010-01-26  6:43     ` David Brownell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-05 20:32 [PATCH v2 0/4] OF GPIO integration for I2C/SPI GPIO chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: Introduce chip addition/removal notifier Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-09 17:16   ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 17:16     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-05 19:59     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 19:59       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 20:30       ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-05 20:30         ` Anton Vorontsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100126172824.GA20319@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.