From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:44:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428134428.4b0d1cd2@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s2sfa686aa41004271119m4ff1390eh405726d78de86d09-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi Grant,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:19:55 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Ben & Jean,
>
> I'm getting patches queued up for linux-next. Any objections to this
> patch or to merging it via the devicetree tree? This patch is part of
> the device tree support rework that consolidates most of the
> arch-specific code.
I didn't follow closely why it was needed, but I will trust you and the
code contributor. I have no objection.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-28 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 15:22 [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 01/10] driver-core: Add device node pointer to struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via Grant Likely
2010-04-27 18:19 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
[not found] ` <s2sfa686aa41004271119m4ff1390eh405726d78de86d09-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-28 11:44 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: Always use 'struct device.of_node' Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:58 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 15:58 ` Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 15:58 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 16:24 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:24 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:59 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 16:59 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 16:59 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:07 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:07 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:10 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:10 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:10 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 07/10] of: eliminate calls to dev_archdata_set_node() Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:47 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 15:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 15:47 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 16:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: Remove obsolete Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers Grant Likely
2010-03-23 6:57 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 6:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 6:57 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 7:06 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-23 7:06 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-23 7:06 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100428134428.4b0d1cd2@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.