From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:57:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318144836.21082.93040.stgit@angua>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
> node pointer from struct device.
Assuming this is similar to your experimental-devicetree branch, as of
96b4b9d7 it causes a few build errors for me:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/2688/
Broken are 86xx/sbc8641d_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig,
mpc885_ads_defconfig, mpc85xx_defconfig, and pmac32_defconfig.
I haven't dug any further.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:57:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318144836.21082.93040.stgit@angua>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
> node pointer from struct device.
Assuming this is similar to your experimental-devicetree branch, as of
96b4b9d7 it causes a few build errors for me:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/2688/
Broken are 86xx/sbc8641d_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig,
mpc885_ads_defconfig, mpc85xx_defconfig, and pmac32_defconfig.
I haven't dug any further.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:57:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318144836.21082.93040.stgit@angua>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
> node pointer from struct device.
Assuming this is similar to your experimental-devicetree branch, as of
96b4b9d7 it causes a few build errors for me:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/2688/
Broken are 86xx/sbc8641d_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig,
mpc885_ads_defconfig, mpc85xx_defconfig, and pmac32_defconfig.
I haven't dug any further.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-23 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 15:22 [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 01/10] driver-core: Add device node pointer to struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via Grant Likely
2010-04-27 18:19 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
[not found] ` <s2sfa686aa41004271119m4ff1390eh405726d78de86d09-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-28 11:44 ` Jean Delvare
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: Always use 'struct device.of_node' Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:58 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 15:58 ` Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 15:58 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 16:24 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:24 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:59 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 16:59 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 16:59 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:07 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:07 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:10 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:10 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:10 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get node pointer Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 07/10] of: eliminate calls to dev_archdata_set_node() Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:47 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 15:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 15:47 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 16:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: Remove obsolete Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers Grant Likely
2010-03-23 6:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2010-03-23 6:57 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 6:57 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 7:06 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-23 7:06 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-23 7:06 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.