From: Andre Prendel <andre.prendel@gmx.de>
To: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:03:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511190327.GA2031@andre-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE81B7B.7010804@theptrgroup.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote:
Hi Jeff,
A few comments below.
> Add support for reading and writing the n-factor correction
> registers. This is needed to compensate for the characteristics
> of a particular sensor hanging off of the remote channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> index 738c472..c9e9855 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum chips { tmp421, tmp422, tmp423 };
>
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_MSB[4] = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_LSB[4] = { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13 };
> +static const u8 TMP421_NFACTOR[3] = { 0x21, 0x22, 0x23 };
>
> /* Flags */
> #define TMP421_CONFIG_SHUTDOWN 0x40
> @@ -157,6 +158,38 @@ static ssize_t show_fault(struct device *dev,
> return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
> }
>
> +static ssize_t show_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + s8 nfactor;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + nfactor = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1]);
There should be spaces within the array index, [index - 1].
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", nfactor);
> +}
I'de prefer implementing the sysfs access methods in a consistent way (see other functions). That means adding the nfactor register to the tmp421_data structure and using tmp421_update_device() to update the structure.
> +static ssize_t set_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + int nfactor = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1],
Missing spaces in array index again.
> + SENSORS_LIMIT(nfactor, -128, 127));
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> int n)
> {
> @@ -177,19 +210,28 @@ static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject
> *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 0);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 1);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 2);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 3);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 3);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 3);
>
> static struct attribute *tmp421_attr[] = {
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> NULL
> };
>
Regards,
Andre
PS: CC'ed lm-sensors list
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Prendel <andre.prendel@gmx.de>
To: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 21:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511190327.GA2031@andre-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE81B7B.7010804@theptrgroup.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote:
Hi Jeff,
A few comments below.
> Add support for reading and writing the n-factor correction
> registers. This is needed to compensate for the characteristics
> of a particular sensor hanging off of the remote channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> index 738c472..c9e9855 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum chips { tmp421, tmp422, tmp423 };
>
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_MSB[4] = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
> static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_LSB[4] = { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13 };
> +static const u8 TMP421_NFACTOR[3] = { 0x21, 0x22, 0x23 };
>
> /* Flags */
> #define TMP421_CONFIG_SHUTDOWN 0x40
> @@ -157,6 +158,38 @@ static ssize_t show_fault(struct device *dev,
> return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
> }
>
> +static ssize_t show_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + s8 nfactor;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + nfactor = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1]);
There should be spaces within the array index, [index - 1].
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", nfactor);
> +}
I'de prefer implementing the sysfs access methods in a consistent way (see other functions). That means adding the nfactor register to the tmp421_data structure and using tmp421_update_device() to update the structure.
> +static ssize_t set_nfactor(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *devattr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> + int nfactor = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1],
Missing spaces in array index again.
> + SENSORS_LIMIT(nfactor, -128, 127));
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> int n)
> {
> @@ -177,19 +210,28 @@ static mode_t tmp421_is_visible(struct kobject
> *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 0);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 1);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 1);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 2);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp3_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 2);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_input, S_IRUGO, show_temp_value, NULL, 3);
> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_fault, S_IRUGO, show_fault, NULL, 3);
> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp4_nfactor, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + show_nfactor, set_nfactor, 3);
>
> static struct attribute *tmp421_attr[] = {
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp3_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_input.dev_attr.attr,
> &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_fault.dev_attr.attr,
> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp4_nfactor.dev_attr.attr,
> NULL
> };
>
Regards,
Andre
PS: CC'ed lm-sensors list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-11 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-10 14:43 [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support Jeff Angielski
2010-05-11 19:03 ` Andre Prendel [this message]
2010-05-11 19:03 ` Andre Prendel
2010-05-11 19:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2010-05-11 19:12 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-11 19:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Jeff Angielski
2010-05-11 19:34 ` Jeff Angielski
2010-05-12 7:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2010-05-12 7:27 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-17 20:30 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-17 20:30 ` [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-18 11:38 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-18 11:38 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-18 14:35 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-18 14:35 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-19 7:26 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-19 7:26 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-19 13:16 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jean Delvare
2010-05-19 13:16 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jean Delvare
2010-05-19 17:13 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-19 17:13 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 18:50 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 18:50 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 19:07 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 19:07 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 19:35 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 19:35 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-06-18 14:53 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-06-18 14:53 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:09 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:09 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:59 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Guenter Roeck
2010-07-21 19:46 ` Andre Prendel
2010-07-21 19:46 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-08-14 19:15 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jean Delvare
2010-08-14 19:15 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100511190327.GA2031@andre-laptop \
--to=andre.prendel@gmx.de \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=jeff@theptrgroup.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.