All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
To: Andre Prendel <andre.prendel@gmx.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE9B145.7000702@theptrgroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511190327.GA2031@andre-laptop>

On 05/11/2010 03:03 PM, Andre Prendel wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> A few comments below.
>
>> Add support for reading and writing the n-factor correction
>> registers.  This is needed to compensate for the characteristics
>> of a particular sensor hanging off of the remote channels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Angielski<jeff@theptrgroup.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> index 738c472..c9e9855 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum chips { tmp421, tmp422, tmp423 };
>>
>>   static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_MSB[4]		= { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
>>   static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_LSB[4]		= { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13 };
>> +static const u8 TMP421_NFACTOR[3]		= { 0x21, 0x22, 0x23 };
>>
>>   /* Flags */
>>   #define TMP421_CONFIG_SHUTDOWN			0x40
>> @@ -157,6 +158,38 @@ static ssize_t show_fault(struct device *dev,
>>   		return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
>>   }
>>
>> +static ssize_t show_nfactor(struct device *dev,
>> +			  struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> +	struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
>> +	s8 nfactor;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	nfactor = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1]);
>
> There should be spaces within the array index, [index - 1].

Ok.

>
>> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", nfactor);
>> +}
>
> I'de prefer implementing the sysfs access methods in a consistent way (see other functions). That means adding the nfactor register to the tmp421_data structure and using tmp421_update_device() to update the structure.

I did this on purpose since the nfactor typically only changes once at 
runtime when you program it for your sensor.  It seemed like a waste of 
processing power and i2c bandwidth to read a "pseudo static" register 
over and over again.

It can easily be changed if that's what will help the community the best.

>> +static ssize_t set_nfactor(struct device *dev,
>> +		struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +		const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> +	struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
>> +	int nfactor = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1],
>
> Missing spaces in array index again.

Ok.




-- 
Jeff Angielski
The PTR Group
www.theptrgroup.com

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Angielski <jeff@theptrgroup.com>
To: Andre Prendel <andre.prendel@gmx.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:34:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE9B145.7000702@theptrgroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511190327.GA2031@andre-laptop>

On 05/11/2010 03:03 PM, Andre Prendel wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> A few comments below.
>
>> Add support for reading and writing the n-factor correction
>> registers.  This is needed to compensate for the characteristics
>> of a particular sensor hanging off of the remote channels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Angielski<jeff@theptrgroup.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> index 738c472..c9e9855 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp421.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum chips { tmp421, tmp422, tmp423 };
>>
>>   static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_MSB[4]		= { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
>>   static const u8 TMP421_TEMP_LSB[4]		= { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13 };
>> +static const u8 TMP421_NFACTOR[3]		= { 0x21, 0x22, 0x23 };
>>
>>   /* Flags */
>>   #define TMP421_CONFIG_SHUTDOWN			0x40
>> @@ -157,6 +158,38 @@ static ssize_t show_fault(struct device *dev,
>>   		return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
>>   }
>>
>> +static ssize_t show_nfactor(struct device *dev,
>> +			  struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> +	struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
>> +	s8 nfactor;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	nfactor = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1]);
>
> There should be spaces within the array index, [index - 1].

Ok.

>
>> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", nfactor);
>> +}
>
> I'de prefer implementing the sysfs access methods in a consistent way (see other functions). That means adding the nfactor register to the tmp421_data structure and using tmp421_update_device() to update the structure.

I did this on purpose since the nfactor typically only changes once at 
runtime when you program it for your sensor.  It seemed like a waste of 
processing power and i2c bandwidth to read a "pseudo static" register 
over and over again.

It can easily be changed if that's what will help the community the best.

>> +static ssize_t set_nfactor(struct device *dev,
>> +		struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> +		const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> +	struct tmp421_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
>> +	int nfactor = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, TMP421_NFACTOR[index-1],
>
> Missing spaces in array index again.

Ok.




-- 
Jeff Angielski
The PTR Group
www.theptrgroup.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-10 14:43 [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support Jeff Angielski
2010-05-11 19:03 ` [lm-sensors] " Andre Prendel
2010-05-11 19:03   ` Andre Prendel
2010-05-11 19:12   ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2010-05-11 19:12     ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-11 19:34   ` Jeff Angielski [this message]
2010-05-11 19:34     ` Jeff Angielski
2010-05-12  7:27     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2010-05-12  7:27       ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-17 20:30   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-17 20:30     ` [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-18 11:38     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-18 11:38       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-18 14:35       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-18 14:35         ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-19  7:26         ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-19  7:26           ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-19 13:16           ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jean Delvare
2010-05-19 13:16             ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jean Delvare
2010-05-19 17:13           ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-19 17:13             ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 18:50             ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 18:50               ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 19:07               ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 19:07                 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jeff Angielski
2010-05-20 19:35                 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-05-20 19:35                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-06-18 14:53                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-06-18 14:53                     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:09                   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:09                     ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-07-20 15:59   ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Guenter Roeck
2010-07-21 19:46     ` Andre Prendel
2010-07-21 19:46       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Andre Prendel
2010-08-14 19:15       ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd Jean Delvare
2010-08-14 19:15         ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt) Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE9B145.7000702@theptrgroup.com \
    --to=jeff@theptrgroup.com \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=andre.prendel@gmx.de \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.