From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: PMBus support in Linux
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 21:42:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100529044239.GA19155@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529023401.GB12507@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:34:01PM -0400, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> CCing lm-sensors and David...
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:16:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > does anyone know if there is an effort to add infrastructure for PMBus
> > support (or support for specific PMBus devices) to Linux ?
>
> I found this:
>
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-April/022969.html
>
I found that as well, but that was about it. Not sure if I want to use it
as a starting point or even for reference since it is gplv3.
Probably useful for debugging, though.
> Hmm, sitting ontop of SMBus, it makes perfect sense to use i2c-dev (David knows
> what he is doing, of course ;)). But having no repo and all, it is hard to
> maintain this utility. Is there any chance to pick it up in the kernel-tree?
> tools/i2c/ or such? Hmm, it's GPL v3...
>
Maybe there is now more interest in kernel driver support - looks like there
are several PMBus chips available today.
If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual drivers or
if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first.
Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into the kernel ?
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] PMBus support in Linux
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 04:42:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100529044239.GA19155@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529023401.GB12507@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:34:01PM -0400, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> CCing lm-sensors and David...
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:16:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > does anyone know if there is an effort to add infrastructure for PMBus
> > support (or support for specific PMBus devices) to Linux ?
>
> I found this:
>
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-April/022969.html
>
I found that as well, but that was about it. Not sure if I want to use it
as a starting point or even for reference since it is gplv3.
Probably useful for debugging, though.
> Hmm, sitting ontop of SMBus, it makes perfect sense to use i2c-dev (David knows
> what he is doing, of course ;)). But having no repo and all, it is hard to
> maintain this utility. Is there any chance to pick it up in the kernel-tree?
> tools/i2c/ or such? Hmm, it's GPL v3...
>
Maybe there is now more interest in kernel driver support - looks like there
are several PMBus chips available today.
If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual drivers or
if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first.
Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into the kernel ?
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-29 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 16:16 PMBus support in Linux Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 2:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 2:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 4:42 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2010-05-29 4:42 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 8:53 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529085301.GA14982-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 15:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529153312.GA20814-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 15:47 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529154741.GB7572-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 17:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529171229.GA21284-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 4:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-30 4:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100530041507.GA20222-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 15:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-30 15:08 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529023401.GB12507-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 7:39 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-29 7:39 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100529093929.38e03e06-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 8:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529081633.GA7428-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 10:03 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-29 10:03 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100529044239.GA19155@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.