From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Brownell
<dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: PMBus support in Linux
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]
> If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual drivers or
> if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first.
> Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into the kernel ?
Did I get this correct: The plan is to support PMBus-devices and let them
report their data in a hwmon-compatible-way?
(If so, did you already check how well PMBus data maps to the
hwmon-sysfs-interface?)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Brownell
<dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] PMBus support in Linux
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 08:53:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]
> If there is no activity yet, question is if I should write individual drivers or
> if I should define a PMBus infrastructure on top of i2c/smbus first.
> Any thoughts on which approach would be more likely to be accepted into the kernel ?
Did I get this correct: The plan is to support PMBus-devices and let them
report their data in a hwmon-compatible-way?
(If so, did you already check how well PMBus data maps to the
hwmon-sysfs-interface?)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-29 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 16:16 PMBus support in Linux Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 2:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 2:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 4:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 4:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529044239.GA19155-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-05-29 8:53 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529085301.GA14982-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 15:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529153312.GA20814-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 15:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 15:47 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529154741.GB7572-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-29 17:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529171229.GA21284-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 4:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-30 4:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100530041507.GA20222-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-30 15:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-05-30 15:08 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20100529023401.GB12507-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 7:39 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-29 7:39 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100529093929.38e03e06-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-29 8:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100529081633.GA7428-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-29 10:03 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-29 10:03 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100529085301.GA14982@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.