All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>,
	Guenter Roeck
	<guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Brown
	<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Goyette <paul-3orOWTcw9wBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
	<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Add strict test of logical test continuations at beginning of line
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:34:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100711213444.4243014c@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278874632.1501.68.camel-AkRN8/LKpobuYGix6ZUp1Q@public.gmane.org>

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:57:12 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 18:21 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:16:58 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:31:06AM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Kernel style seems to prefer having logical tests at
> > > > end of line rather than start of line.
> > > Ok. Would be nice to have checkpatch.pl complain about it, though,
> > > if it is a to-be-enforced rule.
> > Please, not again. This has been discussed before, with the conclusion
> > that nobody really cares and we don't want to add pointless warnings to
> > checkpatch.pl, which in the end will just dissuade people from running
> > the script and/or contributing to the kernel at all.
> 
> I don't remember that discussion.  Link?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/5/65

You started the thread, so I would think you'd remember it.

> Here's a patch that makes it a "--strict" option
> for those who really want to get all the style
> checking options.
> 
> It also corrects a spelling typo.

It's the wrong way of writing patches. Separate things go to separate
patches.

> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> ---
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index bd88f11..f0a4c25 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2180,6 +2180,11 @@ sub process {
>  			ERROR("space required before the open parenthesis '('\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
> +# Strict only - logical tests should be at EOL, not beginning of new lines
> +		if ($line=~/^.\s*(\&\&|\|\|)/) {
> +			CHK("logical test continuations should be on the previous line\n" . $hereprev);
> +		}
> +

As long as it doesn't bug me by default, I don't really care. But I
still believe this is a waste of everybody's time.

>  # Check for illegal assignment in if conditional -- and check for trailing
>  # statements after the conditional.
>  		if ($line =~ /do\s*(?!{)/) {
> @@ -2299,7 +2304,7 @@ sub process {
>  
>  #no spaces allowed after \ in define
>  		if ($line=~/\#\s*define.*\\\s$/) {
> -			WARN("Whitepspace after \\ makes next lines useless\n" . $herecurr);
> +			WARN("Whitespace after \\ makes next lines useless\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
>  #warn if <asm/foo.h> is #included and <linux/foo.h> is available (uses RAW line)
> 
> 


-- 
Jean Delvare

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Add strict test of logical test continuations at beginning of line
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:34:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100711213444.4243014c@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278874632.1501.68.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:57:12 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 18:21 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:16:58 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:31:06AM -0400, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Kernel style seems to prefer having logical tests at
> > > > end of line rather than start of line.
> > > Ok. Would be nice to have checkpatch.pl complain about it, though,
> > > if it is a to-be-enforced rule.
> > Please, not again. This has been discussed before, with the conclusion
> > that nobody really cares and we don't want to add pointless warnings to
> > checkpatch.pl, which in the end will just dissuade people from running
> > the script and/or contributing to the kernel at all.
> 
> I don't remember that discussion.  Link?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/5/65

You started the thread, so I would think you'd remember it.

> Here's a patch that makes it a "--strict" option
> for those who really want to get all the style
> checking options.
> 
> It also corrects a spelling typo.

It's the wrong way of writing patches. Separate things go to separate
patches.

> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com
> ---
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index bd88f11..f0a4c25 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2180,6 +2180,11 @@ sub process {
>  			ERROR("space required before the open parenthesis '('\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
> +# Strict only - logical tests should be at EOL, not beginning of new lines
> +		if ($line=~/^.\s*(\&\&|\|\|)/) {
> +			CHK("logical test continuations should be on the previous line\n" . $hereprev);
> +		}
> +

As long as it doesn't bug me by default, I don't really care. But I
still believe this is a waste of everybody's time.

>  # Check for illegal assignment in if conditional -- and check for trailing
>  # statements after the conditional.
>  		if ($line =~ /do\s*(?!{)/) {
> @@ -2299,7 +2304,7 @@ sub process {
>  
>  #no spaces allowed after \ in define
>  		if ($line=~/\#\s*define.*\\\s$/) {
> -			WARN("Whitepspace after \\ makes next lines useless\n" . $herecurr);
> +			WARN("Whitespace after \\ makes next lines useless\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
>  #warn if <asm/foo.h> is #included and <linux/foo.h> is available (uses RAW line)
> 
> 


-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-11 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-11 14:53 [PATCH v2] hwmon: Add support for JEDEC JC 42.4 compliant temperature sensors Guenter Roeck
2010-07-11 14:53 ` Guenter Roeck
     [not found] ` <1278859984-22593-1-git-send-email-guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 15:31   ` Joe Perches
2010-07-11 15:31     ` Joe Perches
     [not found]     ` <1278862266.1501.59.camel-AkRN8/LKpobuYGix6ZUp1Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 16:16       ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-11 16:16         ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-11 16:21         ` Jean Delvare
2010-07-11 16:21           ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]           ` <20100711182138.132815e4-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 18:57             ` [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Add strict test of logical test continuations at beginning of line Joe Perches
2010-07-11 18:57               ` Joe Perches
     [not found]               ` <1278874632.1501.68.camel-AkRN8/LKpobuYGix6ZUp1Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 19:34                 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-07-11 19:34                   ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]                   ` <20100711213444.4243014c-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 19:52                     ` Joe Perches
2010-07-11 19:52                       ` Joe Perches
     [not found]                       ` <1278877979.1501.76.camel-AkRN8/LKpobuYGix6ZUp1Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-11 21:15                         ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-11 21:15                           ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-12 22:49   ` [PATCH v2] hwmon: Add support for JEDEC JC 42.4 compliant temperature sensors Andrew Morton
2010-07-12 22:49     ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]     ` <20100712154949.3230beec.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-12 23:07       ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-12 23:07         ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100711213444.4243014c@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=apw-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=guenter.roeck-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paul-3orOWTcw9wBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rdunlap-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.