* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
@ 2010-07-20 1:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-20 6:54 ` Jean Delvare
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-20 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
>
> The module loads fine:
>
> # modprobe w83627ehf
> # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> chip at 0xa10
> # sensors
> w83667hg-isa-0a10
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > thermistor
> temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
>
Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
2010-07-20 1:24 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-20 6:54 ` Jean Delvare
2010-07-20 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-07-20 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> >
> > The module loads fine:
> >
> > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > chip at 0xa10
> > # sensors
> > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > thermistor
> > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> >
> Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
>
> Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
check that all the alarms go away.
The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
from the right register/bit.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
2010-07-20 1:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-20 6:54 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-07-20 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-20 20:41 ` Guenter Roeck
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-20 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 02:54:52AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > >
> > > The module loads fine:
> > >
> > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > chip at 0xa10
> > > # sensors
> > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > > thermistor
> > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> > >
> > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> >
> > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
>
> Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> check that all the alarms go away.
>
> The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> from the right register/bit.
>
Yes, you are right - that looks suspicious and is inconsistent.
I'll have a look into the spec.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-20 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-20 20:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-20 20:51 ` Jean Delvare
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-20 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > >
> > > The module loads fine:
> > >
> > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > chip at 0xa10
> > > # sensors
> > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > > thermistor
> > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> > >
> > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> >
> > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
>
> Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> check that all the alarms go away.
>
> The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> from the right register/bit.
>
I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-20 20:41 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-20 20:51 ` Jean Delvare
2010-07-20 20:58 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-07-20 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > > >
> > > > The module loads fine:
> > > >
> > > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > > chip at 0xa10
> > > > # sensors
> > > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > > > thermistor
> > > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> > > >
> > > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> > >
> > > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
> >
> > Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> > flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> > are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> > check that all the alarms go away.
> >
> > The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> > there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> > ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> > from the right register/bit.
> >
> I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
> unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.
I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are
mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration
registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6
is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead?
Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-20 20:51 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-07-20 20:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-20 21:26 ` Tobias Preclik
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-20 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:51 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > > > >
> > > > > The module loads fine:
> > > > >
> > > > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > > > chip at 0xa10
> > > > > # sensors
> > > > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > > > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > > > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > > > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > > > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > > > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > > > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > > > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > > > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > > > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > > > > thermistor
> > > > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> > > > >
> > > > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > > > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> > > >
> > > > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
> > >
> > > Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> > > flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> > > are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> > > check that all the alarms go away.
> > >
> > > The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> > > there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> > > ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> > > from the right register/bit.
> > >
> > I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
> > unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.
>
> I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are
> mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration
> registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6
> is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead?
>
Yes, I thought about that too.
> Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track.
>
The detection code seems to be fine - at least I didn't find a problem
with it. Unless, of course, the bit value to enable aux temp monitoring
was reversed in rev B, but the manual doesn't reflect that.
Guess I _must_ be missing something, but right now I have no idea what
it might be.
One thought - Tobias, can you provide sensor output from your BIOS for
comparison ?
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-20 20:58 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-20 21:26 ` Tobias Preclik
2010-07-21 1:40 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Preclik @ 2010-07-20 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On 07/20/2010 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:51 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
>>>>>> compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The module loads fine:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # modprobe w83627ehf
>>>>>> # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
>>>>>> Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
>>>>>> chip at 0xa10
>>>>>> # sensors
>>>>>> w83667hg-isa-0a10
>>>>>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>>>>>> in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
>>>>>> in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
>>>>>> in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
>>>>>> in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
>>>>>> in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
>>>>>> in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
>>>>>> in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
>>>>>> in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
>>>>>> fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
>>>>>> fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
>>>>>> fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
>>>>>> fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
>>>>>> fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
>>>>>> temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor >>>>>> thermistor
>>>>>> temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
>>>>>> temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
>>>>>> cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
>>>>>>
>>>>> Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
>>>>> Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
>>>> flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
>>>> are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
>>>> check that all the alarms go away.
>>>>
>>>> The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
>>>> there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
>>>> ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
>>>> from the right register/bit.
>>>>
>>> I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
>>> unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.
>>
>> I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are
>> mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration
>> registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6
>> is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead?
>>
> Yes, I thought about that too.
>
>> Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track.
>>
> The detection code seems to be fine - at least I didn't find a problem
> with it. Unless, of course, the bit value to enable aux temp monitoring
> was reversed in rev B, but the manual doesn't reflect that.
>
> Guess I _must_ be missing something, but right now I have no idea what
> it might be.
>
> One thought - Tobias, can you provide sensor output from your BIOS for
> comparison ?
These are all PC Health informations I could find in the BIOS:
CPU Temp = 49°C
CPUFAN = 1692 RPM
Vcore = 1.232V
3VCC = 3.360V
VTT 1.1V = 1.120V
PCH Voltage = 1.096V
IGD Voltage = toggles between 1.176V and 1.184V
VSB = 3.280V
VBAT = 3.344V
The voltages are rather hard to match aren't they?
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Tobias
PS: I cannot answer my mails until Sunday.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-20 21:26 ` Tobias Preclik
@ 2010-07-21 1:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-08-14 19:21 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-14 19:36 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-21 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and
> > > > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output:
> > > > >
> > > > > The module loads fine:
> > > > >
> > > > > # modprobe w83627ehf
> > > > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
> > > > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B
> > > > > chip at 0xa10
> > > > > # sensors
> > > > > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > > > > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > > > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > > > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > > > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > > > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > > > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > > > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > > > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > > > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > > > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > > > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > > > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > > > > thermistor
> > > > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > > > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
> > > > >
> > > > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off.
> > > > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured.
> > > >
> > > > Jean, any idea/thoughts ?
> > >
> > > Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm
> > > flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these
> > > are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and
> > > check that all the alarms go away.
> > >
> > > The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but
> > > there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to
> > > ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag
> > > from the right register/bit.
> > >
> > I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips,
> > unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on.
>
> I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are
> mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration
> registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6
> is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead?
>
> Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track.
>
I did some research on the web. Looks like temp3 almost always shows
very low temperatures for the W83667, and also for w83627ehf. Also, since
the reading is low, but there is no low limit, there isn't really a reason
for raising an alarm.
Also, min/max values for voltages seem to be off almost everywhere.
And values for temp1_max and temp1_hyst are often negative or very low.
So, in summry, looks like -B support is just as good or as bad as support
for the other chips. Not sure if that is good or bad, though, since the
off-track readings are so common.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-21 1:40 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-08-14 19:21 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-14 19:36 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-08-14 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:40:17 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I did some research on the web. Looks like temp3 almost always shows
> very low temperatures for the W83667, and also for w83627ehf. Also, since
> the reading is low, but there is no low limit, there isn't really a reason
> for raising an alarm.
>
> Also, min/max values for voltages seem to be off almost everywhere.
> And values for temp1_max and temp1_hyst are often negative or very low.
These chips simply don't initialize the limits to anything sane by
default. It's the user's (or BIOS') job to write sane limits. This
doesn't mean anything about the driver.
> So, in summry, looks like -B support is just as good or as bad as support
> for the other chips. Not sure if that is good or bad, though, since the
> off-track readings are so common.
Off-track reading are "fine" as long as the alarm flags match.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing
2010-07-18 12:02 [lm-sensors] W83667HG-B testing Tobias Preclik
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-14 19:21 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-08-14 19:36 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-08-14 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Tobias,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:26:04 +0200, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote:
> > # sensors
> > w83667hg-isa-0a10
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM
> > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM
> > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM
> > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V)
> > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM
> > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM
> > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM
> > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor > > thermistor
> > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor
> > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V
>
> These are all PC Health informations I could find in the BIOS:
>
> CPU Temp = 49°C
> CPUFAN = 1692 RPM
> Vcore = 1.232V
> 3VCC = 3.360V
> VTT 1.1V = 1.120V
> PCH Voltage = 1.096V
> IGD Voltage = toggles between 1.176V and 1.184V
> VSB = 3.280V
> VBAT = 3.344V
>
> The voltages are rather hard to match aren't they?
Not at all. in1 is VTT 1.1V (+1.11 V vs 1.120V). in2 and in3 are 3VCC
(+3.36 V vs 3.360V, hardwired so can't be wrong.) in4 is PCH Voltage
(+1.10 V vs 1.096V). in5 is IGD Voltage (+1.18 V vs 1.176V/1.184V). in7
and in8 are VSB and VBAT respectively (values match perfectly and they
are internally wired too.)
The remaining pair is in0 for Vcore. The different value can be
explained by your BIOS running the CPU at its max frequency while Linux
runs it as a lower frequency (and voltage is scaled down at lower
frequencies.) This also explains the different CPU temperature (most
probably temp2) and fan speed (fan2), assuming there is some form of
automatic fan speed control in place.
The BIOS doesn't show any value which Linux doesn't, so I'd say we are
fine. And you can use the following as your configuration file:
chip "w83667hg-isa-0a10"
# Voltages
label in0 "Vcore"
label in1 "Vtt"
label in2 "AVCC"
label in3 "+3.3V"
label in4 "PCH"
label in5 "IGD"
label in7 "3VSB"
label in8 "Vbat"
set in1_min 1.1 * 0.95
set in1_max 1.1 * 1.05
set in2_min 3.3 * 0.90
set in2_max 3.3 * 1.10
set in3_min 3.3 * 0.90
set in3_max 3.3 * 1.10
set in4_min 1.1 * 0.95
set in4_max 1.1 * 1.05
set in7_min 3.3 * 0.90
set in7_max 3.3 * 1.10
set in8_min 3.0 * 0.90
set in8_max 3.0 * 1.10
# Fans
ignore fan1
label fan2 "CPU Fan"
ignore fan3
ignore fan4
ignore fan5
set fan2_min 800
# Temperatures
label temp1 "M/B Temp"
label temp2 "CPU Temp"
ignore temp3
set temp1_max 55
set temp1_max_hyst 52
I'll add it to the wiki now for reference.
--
Jean Delvare
http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread