All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Marc Titinger <mtittinge@hotmail.com>
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	acme@redhat.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:50:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100913075025.GA14882@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SNT125-W35B89F6AA83C8DD22E7946BA770@phx.gbl>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:13:32AM +0200, Marc Titinger wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I'm just being curious : do these patches change the way those chips
> should be supported, that do not have a PMU-like IP, but implement
> PC-sampling thanks to a general purpose timer (not the system timer)
> ?

CPUs that do not have a PMU are not required to use the perf-events
oprofile backend, it is entirely optional. The pc-sampling timer in
oprofile is not affected by this series.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Marc Titinger <mtittinge@hotmail.com>
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	acme@redhat.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:50:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100913075025.GA14882@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SNT125-W35B89F6AA83C8DD22E7946BA770@phx.gbl>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:13:32AM +0200, Marc Titinger wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I'm just being curious : do these patches change the way those chips
> should be supported, that do not have a PMU-like IP, but implement
> PC-sampling thanks to a general purpose timer (not the system timer)
> ?

CPUs that do not have a PMU are not required to use the perf-events
oprofile backend, it is entirely optional. The pc-sampling timer in
oprofile is not affected by this series.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matt@console-pimps.org (Matt Fleming)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:50:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100913075025.GA14882@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SNT125-W35B89F6AA83C8DD22E7946BA770@phx.gbl>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:13:32AM +0200, Marc Titinger wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I'm just being curious : do these patches change the way those chips
> should be supported, that do not have a PMU-like IP, but implement
> PC-sampling thanks to a general purpose timer (not the system timer)
> ?

CPUs that do not have a PMU are not required to use the perf-events
oprofile backend, it is entirely optional. The pc-sampling timer in
oprofile is not affected by this series.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-13  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-13  6:07 [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: Add helper function to return number of counters Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:32   ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:32     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:32     ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: Add helper function to return number of Robert Richter
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: oprofile: Rename op_arm to oprofile_perf Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:46   ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:46     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:46     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate init/exit functions Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:55   ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:55     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:55     ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate Robert Richter
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] oprofile: Abstract the perf-events backend Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 13:15   ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 13:15     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 13:15     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Make oprofile depend on CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  8:39   ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13  8:39     ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13  8:39     ` Will Deacon
2010-09-16 13:34     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 13:34       ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 13:34       ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13  9:22   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-09-13  9:22     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-09-13  9:22     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-09-13  6:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] sh: oprofile: Use perf-events oprofile backend Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  6:07   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 14:32   ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:32     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:32     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 20:01     ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 20:01       ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 20:01       ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:07       ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:07         ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:07         ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:26         ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:26           ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:26           ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:45           ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:45             ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:45             ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:45             ` Robert Richter
2010-09-28  8:33             ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-28  8:33               ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-28  8:33               ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-30  1:04           ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-30  1:04             ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-30  1:04             ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-30  8:14             ` Will Deacon
2010-09-30  8:14               ` Will Deacon
2010-09-30  8:14               ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13  7:13 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile Marc Titinger
2010-09-13  7:13   ` Marc Titinger
2010-09-13  7:50   ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2010-09-13  7:50     ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  7:50     ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13  8:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13  8:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13  8:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13 11:04       ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 11:04         ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 11:04         ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 10:08 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 10:08   ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 10:08   ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 11:18   ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 11:18     ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 11:18     ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 14:48     ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:48       ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:48       ` Robert Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100913075025.GA14882@console-pimps.org \
    --to=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtittinge@hotmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.