From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
peterz@infradead.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, tj@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:14:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux.
I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ.
What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org,
tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:14:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux.
I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ.
What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 21:29 [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() Richard Weinberger
2010-10-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-10-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 22:23 ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2010-10-11 22:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2010-10-11 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.