From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
peterz@infradead.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, tj@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:23:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010120023.10861.richard@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 00:14:47 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
> away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?
Yes.
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt:
What: __do_IRQ all in one fits nothing interrupt handler
When: 2.6.32
Why: __do_IRQ was kept for easy migration to the type flow handlers.
More than two years of migration time is enough.
Who: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Thanks,
//richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org,
tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:23:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010120023.10861.richard@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 00:14:47 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
> away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?
Yes.
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt:
What: __do_IRQ all in one fits nothing interrupt handler
When: 2.6.32
Why: __do_IRQ was kept for easy migration to the type flow handlers.
More than two years of migration time is enough.
Who: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 21:29 [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() Richard Weinberger
2010-10-11 22:14 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 22:23 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2010-10-11 22:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2010-10-11 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010120023.10861.richard@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.