From: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE <awg@embtoolkit.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201011291156.09784.anarsoul@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289247983-20747-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com>
On Monday 08 November 2010 22:26:23 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Currently the {set,get}_pull callbacks of the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default
> structure are initalized via s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up. This results in a
> linker error when compiling kernel for s3c2442:
>
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f4): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_getpull_1up'
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f8): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_setpull_1up'
>
> The s3c2442 has pulldowns instead of pullups compared to the s3c2440.
> The method of controlling them is the same though.
> So this patch modifies the existing s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up helper
> functions to take an additional parameter deciding whether the pin has a
> pullup or pulldown. The s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1{down,up} functions then
> wrap that functions passing either S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP or S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN.
>
> Furthermore this patch sets up the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default.{get,set}_pull
> fields in the s3c2442 cpu init function to the new pulldown helper
> functions.
>
> Based on patch from "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>
Hi there,
Can any samsung-soc maintainer review/merge this patch?
I should admit that merging patches through samsung maintainers became pretty
impossible - response latency is about 1 month, some patches (not mine) are
still pending. I've sent first version of this patch on 6th of November, few
weeks of standby - and we'll get 2.6.37 with broken s3c2442 support. Yeah, I
know that maintainers are living people too, and they need to pay attention to
real life, work, family, etc, but now merging some samsung-soc-related patch
is really painfull and slow proccess, and it would be nice if it could be
somehow improved.
Regards
Vasily
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201011291156.09784.anarsoul@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289247983-20747-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com>
On Monday 08 November 2010 22:26:23 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> Currently the {set,get}_pull callbacks of the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default
> structure are initalized via s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up. This results in a
> linker error when compiling kernel for s3c2442:
>
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f4): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_getpull_1up'
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/built-in.o:(.data+0x13f8): undefined reference to
> `s3c_gpio_setpull_1up'
>
> The s3c2442 has pulldowns instead of pullups compared to the s3c2440.
> The method of controlling them is the same though.
> So this patch modifies the existing s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up helper
> functions to take an additional parameter deciding whether the pin has a
> pullup or pulldown. The s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1{down,up} functions then
> wrap that functions passing either S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP or S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN.
>
> Furthermore this patch sets up the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default.{get,set}_pull
> fields in the s3c2442 cpu init function to the new pulldown helper
> functions.
>
> Based on patch from "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>
Hi there,
Can any samsung-soc maintainer review/merge this patch?
I should admit that merging patches through samsung maintainers became pretty
impossible - response latency is about 1 month, some patches (not mine) are
still pending. I've sent first version of this patch on 6th of November, few
weeks of standby - and we'll get 2.6.37 with broken s3c2442 support. Yeah, I
know that maintainers are living people too, and they need to pay attention to
real life, work, family, etc, but now merging some samsung-soc-related patch
is really painfull and slow proccess, and it would be nice if it could be
somehow improved.
Regards
Vasily
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 22:00 [PATCH] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-09-20 22:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-09-20 22:00 ` [PATCH] ARM: s3c24xx: Set ARCH_NR_GPIOS according to the selected SoC types Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-09-20 22:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-09-20 23:41 ` [PATCH] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Ben Dooks
2010-09-20 23:41 ` Ben Dooks
2010-09-21 5:28 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE
2010-09-21 5:28 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE
2010-11-06 7:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-06 7:54 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-06 16:09 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE
2010-11-08 9:08 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-08 9:08 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-08 20:26 ` [PATCH v3] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-08 20:26 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-08 21:41 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE
2010-11-08 21:41 ` Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE
2010-11-29 9:56 ` Vasily Khoruzhick [this message]
2010-11-29 9:56 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-29 10:15 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-11-29 10:15 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-11-29 10:26 ` [PATCH RESEND " Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-29 10:26 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 6:18 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-11-30 6:18 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Kukjin Kim
2010-11-30 11:53 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 11:53 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 12:01 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 12:01 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 13:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 13:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 14:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 14:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 15:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 15:01 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 19:46 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 19:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 19:59 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2010-11-30 20:05 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 20:05 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 20:12 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 20:12 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 0:22 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Ben Dooks
2010-12-03 9:40 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 7:26 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 7:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 10:17 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 10:17 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 12:05 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 12:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 12:16 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v5] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 5:28 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 5:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 6:19 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 6:19 ` [PATCH v4] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 6:29 ` [PATCH v6] ARM: s3c244x: Fix mess with gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 6:29 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-30 19:46 ` [PATCH v4] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-12-01 5:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup " Kukjin Kim
2010-12-01 5:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks Kukjin Kim
2010-11-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-11-29 10:28 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201011291156.09784.anarsoul@gmail.com \
--to=anarsoul@gmail.com \
--cc=awg@embtoolkit.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.