From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Shyam_Iyer@dell.com
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
rwheeler@redhat.com,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:59:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110329195953.GD21671@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBFB1B45AF80394ABD1C807E9F28D15702659D0033@BLRX7MCDC203.AMER.DELL.COM>
On Tue, Mar 29 2011 at 3:13pm -0400,
Shyam_Iyer@dell.com <Shyam_Iyer@dell.com> wrote:
> > > > Above is pretty generic. Do you have specific needs/ideas/concerns?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Vivek
> > > Yes.. if I limited by Ethernet b/w to 40% I don't need to limit I/O
> > b/w via cgroups. Such bandwidth manipulations are network switch driven
> > and cgroups never take care of these events from the Ethernet driver.
> >
> > So if IO is going over network and actual bandwidth control is taking
> > place by throttling ethernet traffic then one does not have to specify
> > block cgroup throttling policy and hence no need for cgroups to be
> > worried
> > about ethernet driver events?
> >
> > I think I am missing something here.
> >
> > Vivek
> Well.. here is the catch.. example scenario..
>
> - Two iSCSI I/O sessions emanating from Ethernet ports eth0, eth1 multipathed together. Let us say round-robin policy.
>
> - The cgroup profile is to limit I/O bandwidth to 40% of the multipathed I/O bandwidth. But the switch may have limited the I/O bandwidth to 40% for the corresponding vlan associated with one of the eth interface say eth1
>
> The computation that the bandwidth configured is 40% of the available bandwidth is false in this case. What we need to do is possibly push more I/O through eth0 as it is allowed to run at 100% of bandwidth by the switch.
>
> Now this is a dynamic decision and multipathing layer should take care of it.. but it would need a hint..
No hint should be needed. Just use one of the newer multipath path
selectors that are dynamic by design: "queue-length" or "service-time".
This scenario is exactly what those path selectors are meant to address.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 166+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29 5:14 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Amir Goldstein
2011-03-29 11:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-29 12:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-29 13:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 13:38 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 17:20 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:20 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 18:10 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:10 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:13 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:13 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:59 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-03-29 20:12 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:12 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 23:09 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 23:09 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 5:58 ` [Lsf] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:26 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 15:33 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 15:46 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 15:46 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 20:32 ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-03-30 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 19:47 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-03-29 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 20:31 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 0:33 ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-30 2:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 11:13 ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-30 11:28 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 14:07 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01 15:19 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-01 16:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:46 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-02 3:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:43 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:43 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:43 ` Joel Becker
2011-03-30 21:49 ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-31 0:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-31 1:00 ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:34 ` Mingming Cao
2011-04-01 21:49 ` Joel Becker
2011-03-29 15:35 ` [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 19:05 ` [Lsf] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:35 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:39 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:53 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 22:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 22:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-29 23:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-30 16:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31 0:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-31 15:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31 9:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-31 16:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:59 ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-03-29 17:35 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Chad Talbott
2011-03-29 19:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 20:14 ` Chad Talbott
2011-03-29 20:35 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 21:08 ` Greg Thelen
2011-03-30 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 15:37 ` IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Vivek Goyal
2011-03-30 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 22:49 ` Chad Talbott
2011-03-31 3:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-31 14:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 14:34 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-31 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-31 23:43 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01 0:55 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 1:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 6:32 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: " Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-01 7:23 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 15:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 14:49 ` IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: [Lsf] " Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 22:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 14:50 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: " Greg Thelen
2011-03-31 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 17:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 19:57 ` [LSF]: fc_rport attributes to further populate HBAAPIv2 Giridhar Malavali
2011-04-01 21:49 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Dave Chinner
2011-04-02 7:33 ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-02 7:34 ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-05 13:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-05 22:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-06 14:49 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-04-06 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 19:49 ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-06 23:07 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback Greg Thelen
2011-04-06 23:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 19:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 20:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-07 21:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 23:42 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08 0:59 ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-08 1:25 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08 1:25 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 3:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-08 13:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 23:08 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 20:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08 13:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-11 1:05 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-06 15:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 16:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 17:10 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-06 17:14 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-04-08 1:58 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-06 23:50 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 17:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-11 1:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15 21:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-16 3:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-18 21:58 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-18 22:51 ` cgroup IO throttling and filesystem ordered mode (Was: Re: [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF)) Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 14:45 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 17:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 18:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-21 0:32 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 0:29 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:17 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 14:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 15:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 15:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 16:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 17:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 20:58 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 1:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 10:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 11:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 14:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 1:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 18:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-20 19:16 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 15:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 15:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-22 4:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 15:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-22 16:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-04-25 18:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-26 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110329195953.GD21671@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.