Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency

[Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:42:15PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> I'd prefer to see OOM-related issues treated as a separate-but-related
> >> problem if possible so;
> >
> > I prefer it too. The OOM killing is already covered in OOM topic from
> > Hugh, and we can add "OOM detection latency" to it.
> 
> Thanks for adjusting and updating the schedule, Andrea.  I'm way
> behind in my mailbox and everything else, that was a real help.

Glad I could help.

> But last night I did remove that OOM and fork-bomb topic you
> mischievously added in my name ;-)  Yes, I did propose an OOM topic
> against my name in the working list I sent you a few days ago, but by
> Monday had concluded that it would be pretty silly for me to get up
> and spout the few things I have to say about it, in the absence of
> every one of the people most closely involved and experienced.  And on
> fork-bombs I've even less to say.
>
> Of course, none of these sessions are for those named facilitators to
> lecture the assembled company for half an hour.  We can bring it back
> it there's demand on the day: but right now I'd prefer to keep it as
> an empty slot, to be decided when the time comes.  After all, those FS
> people, they appear to thrive on empty slots!

Ok, and agree that the MM track is pretty dense already ;).

Thanks,
Andrea

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>