All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:12:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110329231200.GQ12265@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikDwfQaSGtrKOSvgA9oaRC1Lbx3cw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:13:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> It's okay to me. LRU ordering issue wouldn't take much time.
> But I am not sure Mel would have a long time. :)
> 
> About reclaim latency, I sent a patch in the old days.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=129187231129887&w=4
> 
> And some guys on embedded had a concern about latency.
> They want OOM rather than eviction of working set and undeterministic
> latency of reclaim.
> 
> As another issue of related to latency, there is a OOM.
> To accelerate task's exit, we raise a priority of the victim process
> but it had a problem so Kosaki decided reverting the patch. It's
> totally related to latency issue but it would
> 
> In addition, Kame and I sent a patch to prevent forkbomb. Kame's
> apprach is to track the history of mm and mine is to use sysrq to kill
> recently created tasks. The approaches have pros and cons.
> But anyone seem to not has a interest about forkbomb protection.
> So I want to listen other's opinion we really need it

The sysrq won't help on large servers, virtual clouds or android
devices where there's no keyboard attached and not sysrqd running. So
I'd prefer not requiring sysrq for that, even if you can run a sysrq,
few people would know how to activate an obscure sysrq feature meant
to be more selective than SYSRQ+I (or SYSRQ+B..) for forkbombs, if it
works without human intervention I think it's more valuable.

> I am not sure this could become a topic of LSF/MM

Now the forkbomb detection would fit nicely as a subtopic into Hugh's
OOM topic. I found one more spare MM slot on 5 April 12:30-13, so for
now I filled it with OOM and forkbomb.

> If it is proper, I would like to talk above issues in "Reclaim,
> compaction and LRU ordering" slot.

Sounds good to me. I added "allocation latency" to your slot.

Thanks,
Andrea

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-29 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 166+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29  5:14 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Amir Goldstein
2011-03-29 11:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 11:22   ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-29 12:17     ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-29 13:09       ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:09         ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:12         ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 13:38         ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 17:20   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:20     ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 18:10       ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:10         ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:45         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:13           ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:13             ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:57             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:59             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 20:12               ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:12                 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:23                 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 23:09                   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 23:09                     ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30  5:58                     ` [Lsf] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:02                       ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:10                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:26                           ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:55                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 15:33                               ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 15:46                                 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 15:46                                   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 20:32                                 ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-03-30 20:45                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 19:47   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-03-29 20:29   ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 20:31     ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30  0:33   ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-30  2:17     ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 11:13       ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-30 11:28         ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 14:07           ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01 15:19           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-01 16:30             ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:46               ` Joel Becker
2011-04-02  3:26                 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:43             ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:43             ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:43             ` Joel Becker
2011-03-30 21:49       ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-31  0:05         ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-31  1:00         ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:34           ` Mingming Cao
2011-04-01 21:49             ` Joel Becker
2011-03-29 15:35 ` [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 19:05   ` [Lsf] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:35     ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:39       ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:45       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:53         ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 21:22     ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 22:38       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 22:13     ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-29 23:12       ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-03-30 16:17       ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-30 16:49         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31  0:42           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-31 15:15             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31  9:30           ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-31 16:36             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:59         ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-03-29 17:35 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Chad Talbott
2011-03-29 19:09   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 20:14     ` Chad Talbott
2011-03-29 20:35     ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 21:08       ` Greg Thelen
2011-03-30  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 15:37     ` IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Vivek Goyal
2011-03-30 22:20       ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 22:49         ` Chad Talbott
2011-03-31  3:00           ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-31 14:16         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 14:34           ` Chris Mason
2011-03-31 22:14             ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-31 23:43               ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01  0:55                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01  1:34               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01  4:36                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01  6:32                   ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: " Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-01  7:23                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 12:56                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 15:07                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 14:49                   ` IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: [Lsf] " Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 22:25             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-31 14:50           ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: " Greg Thelen
2011-03-31 22:27             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-01 17:18               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-01 19:57                 ` [LSF]: fc_rport attributes to further populate HBAAPIv2 Giridhar Malavali
2011-04-01 21:49                 ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Dave Chinner
2011-04-02  7:33                   ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-02  7:34                     ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-05 13:13                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-05 22:56                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-06 14:49                       ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-04-06 15:39                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 19:49                           ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-06 23:07                           ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback Greg Thelen
2011-04-06 23:36                             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 19:24                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 20:33                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-07 21:34                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 23:42                                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08  0:59                                   ` Greg Thelen
2011-04-08  1:25                                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08  1:25                                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12  3:17                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-08 13:43                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 23:08                         ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 20:04                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-07 23:47                             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-08 13:50                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-11  1:05                                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-06 15:37                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 16:08                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-06 17:10                           ` Jan Kara
2011-04-06 17:14                             ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-04-08  1:58                             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:26                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-06 23:50                         ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-07 17:55                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-11  1:36                             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15 21:07                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-16  3:06                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-18 21:58                                   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-18 22:51                                     ` cgroup IO throttling and filesystem ordered mode (Was: Re: [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF)) Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19  0:33                                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:30                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 14:45                                           ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 17:17                                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 18:30                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-21  0:32                                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21  0:29                                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19 14:17                               ` [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 14:34                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 14:48                                   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-19 15:11                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 15:22                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 15:31                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 16:58                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-19 17:05                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-19 20:58                                               ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20  1:21                                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 10:56                                                   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20 11:19                                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 14:42                                                       ` Jan Kara
2011-04-20  1:16                                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 18:44                                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-20 19:16                                                   ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21  0:17                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-21 15:06                                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 15:10                                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 17:20                                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-22  4:21                                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-22 15:25                                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-22 16:28                                                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-04-25 18:19                                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-26 14:37                                                               ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110329231200.GQ12265@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.