All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: myungjoo.ham@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	dg77.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Exynos4 NURI: support for NTC thermistor
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:08:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110622110848.GA18726@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=eBAGCADe1MTdtQ4XnBVpHK+uUNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:00:37PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Mark Brown

> >> +#include <linux/platform_data/ntc_thermistor.h>

> > This doesn't appear to be in mainline.

> Right, not just yet. I should've added comment about the patch just
> being applied to "next".

I was actually looking at -next rather than Linus' tree there...

> Should I surround them with "#ifdef CONFIG_NTC_THERMISTOR"?

I guess, or just wait until it gets merged.

> > Why not do this in an initcall or in the device registration?  This
> > looks like working around a limitation of the ntc_thermistor driver
> > which should be fixed as part of a mainline merge for that.

> Um... I think I can put this away to a common plat-samsung/dev-ntc.c
> as I've seen many S5PC110/S5PV210/Exynos4 devices using NTC attached
> to the CPU's ADC ports.

Yes, but it's not just the location of the code - I was mostly noticing
the fact that it was doing something that's clearly supposed to be a
probe() method in the main read function.  It'd be better if there were
an explicit probe() and corresponding remove() interface.

I also note that this callback based stuff won't work terribly well with
device tree.

> However, I won't be able to put that part into the NTC driver because
> using S3C-ADC is plat-samsung specific method and NTC thermistor
> itself is a general thermistor device not specific to S3C. Maybe, I
> can do so after we've got a common ADC framework.

Yes, we really need to get that ADC stuff sorted soon :(

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] Exynos4 NURI: support for NTC thermistor
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:08:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110622110848.GA18726@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=eBAGCADe1MTdtQ4XnBVpHK+uUNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:00:37PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Mark Brown

> >> +#include <linux/platform_data/ntc_thermistor.h>

> > This doesn't appear to be in mainline.

> Right, not just yet. I should've added comment about the patch just
> being applied to "next".

I was actually looking at -next rather than Linus' tree there...

> Should I surround them with "#ifdef CONFIG_NTC_THERMISTOR"?

I guess, or just wait until it gets merged.

> > Why not do this in an initcall or in the device registration? ?This
> > looks like working around a limitation of the ntc_thermistor driver
> > which should be fixed as part of a mainline merge for that.

> Um... I think I can put this away to a common plat-samsung/dev-ntc.c
> as I've seen many S5PC110/S5PV210/Exynos4 devices using NTC attached
> to the CPU's ADC ports.

Yes, but it's not just the location of the code - I was mostly noticing
the fact that it was doing something that's clearly supposed to be a
probe() method in the main read function.  It'd be better if there were
an explicit probe() and corresponding remove() interface.

I also note that this callback based stuff won't work terribly well with
device tree.

> However, I won't be able to put that part into the NTC driver because
> using S3C-ADC is plat-samsung specific method and NTC thermistor
> itself is a general thermistor device not specific to S3C. Maybe, I
> can do so after we've got a common ADC framework.

Yes, we really need to get that ADC stuff sorted soon :(

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-16  9:09 [PATCH 1/2] Exynos4 NURI: configure regulators and PMIC MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-16  9:09 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-16  9:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] Exynos4 NURI: add MAX17042 fuel gauge MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-16  9:09   ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-18 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Exynos4 NURI: configure regulators and PMIC Mark Brown
2011-06-18 15:12   ` Mark Brown
2011-06-20  6:26   ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-20  6:26     ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-20 10:27     ` Mark Brown
2011-06-20 10:27       ` Mark Brown
2011-06-20  7:58   ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-20  7:58     ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-20 10:31     ` Mark Brown
2011-06-20 10:31       ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21  2:07       ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: Exynos4: NURI Board Configuration Udpate MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07         ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07         ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Exynos4 NURI: configure regulators and PMIC MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  5:33           ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-21  5:33             ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-21 11:10             ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:10               ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:49               ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-21 11:49                 ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-21 11:56                 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:56                   ` Mark Brown
2011-06-22  2:37                 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22  2:37                   ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22  2:31             ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22  2:31               ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22  3:43               ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-22  3:43                 ` Tushar Behera
2011-06-22  9:17                 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-06-22  9:17                   ` Kukjin Kim
2011-06-21 11:07           ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 11:07             ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21  2:07         ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Exynos4 NURI: configure MAX17042 fuel gauge MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07         ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Exynos4 NURI: configure ADC MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07         ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Exynos4 NURI: support for NTC thermistor MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21  2:07           ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-21 10:50           ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 10:50             ` Mark Brown
2011-06-22  5:00             ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22  5:00               ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-06-22 11:08               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-06-22 11:08                 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110622110848.GA18726@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dg77.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.