All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* irqbalance segfaults
@ 2011-06-28 22:45 Mike Wright
  2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Wright @ 2011-06-28 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --]

Hi all,

Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H; CPU is an AMD Phenom X2 B60; 
Memory is 8G 1333 DDR3.

Unfortunately, I've been unable to get any serial port output from it.

The hypervisor I downloaded and compiled is 4.1.1 but 
/sys/hypervisor/version reports 4.0.2.

Kernel is 3.0.0-rc4 from Konrad from 7 days ago.

Running kernel on bare metal works in runlevel 3 and runlevel 5.

Running kernel on xen runs in runlevel 3 but changing to runlevel 5 
shows the "ps2 connector" for about a second then goes to the arrow 
cursor on a black screen.  After that I'm unable to change to any of the 
6 ttys and have to reboot to escape.

When booting the kernel on xen I see the following error go by on the 
kernel's boot info:

irqbalance[1257]: segfault at 4 ip 0000003446a64f6 sp 00007fffd9f72880 
error 6 in lib-2.13.so[3446800000 + 191000]

Attached is the dmesg output which reports a lot of ACPI errors. 
(Apologies, it's 16k).

I've noticed some conversations on this list about Gigabyte boards not 
reporting C1 and C2 data and wonder if this may be related?

Side note: The Xen portion of the boot is blindingly fast compared to 
all previous versions and kernels :)

Thanks for any insight,
Mike Wright

[-- Attachment #2: dmesg.tar.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip, Size: 16818 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: irqbalance segfaults
  2011-06-28 22:45 irqbalance segfaults Mike Wright
@ 2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
  2011-06-28 23:16   ` Mike Wright
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olivier B. @ 2011-06-28 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

Hi,

it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which doesn't exists under Xen PV.
See the Debian report about that : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183

Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but which distribution are you using ?

Olivier

Le 29/06/2011 00:45, Mike Wright a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H; CPU is an AMD Phenom X2 B60; Memory is 8G 1333 DDR3.
>
> Unfortunately, I've been unable to get any serial port output from it.
>
> The hypervisor I downloaded and compiled is 4.1.1 but /sys/hypervisor/version reports 4.0.2.
>
> Kernel is 3.0.0-rc4 from Konrad from 7 days ago.
>
> Running kernel on bare metal works in runlevel 3 and runlevel 5.
>
> Running kernel on xen runs in runlevel 3 but changing to runlevel 5 shows the "ps2 connector" for about a second then goes to the arrow cursor on a black screen. After that I'm unable to change to any of the 6 ttys and have to reboot to escape.
>
> When booting the kernel on xen I see the following error go by on the kernel's boot info:
>
> irqbalance[1257]: segfault at 4 ip 0000003446a64f6 sp 00007fffd9f72880 error 6 in lib-2.13.so[3446800000 + 191000]
>
> Attached is the dmesg output which reports a lot of ACPI errors. (Apologies, it's 16k).
>
> I've noticed some conversations on this list about Gigabyte boards not reporting C1 and C2 data and wonder if this may be related?
>
> Side note: The Xen portion of the boot is blindingly fast compared to all previous versions and kernels :)
>
> Thanks for any insight,
> Mike Wright
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: irqbalance segfaults
  2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
@ 2011-06-28 23:16   ` Mike Wright
  2011-06-29  7:25   ` Ian Campbell
  2011-06-29 14:54   ` Mike Wright
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Wright @ 2011-06-28 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olivier B.; +Cc: xen-devel

On 06/28/2011 04:06 PM, Olivier B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which
> doesn't exists under Xen PV.
> See the Debian report about that :
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183
>
> Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but
> which distribution are you using ?
>

Thanks, Olivier, I'm running Fedora 14.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: irqbalance segfaults
  2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
  2011-06-28 23:16   ` Mike Wright
@ 2011-06-29  7:25   ` Ian Campbell
  2011-06-29 14:54   ` Mike Wright
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2011-06-29  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olivier B.; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

(please don't top post)

On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 00:06 +0100, Olivier B. wrote:
> it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which
> doesn't exists under Xen PV.

I wonder if we should just add a dummy irq0? At least for the time
being.

Ian.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: irqbalance segfaults
  2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
  2011-06-28 23:16   ` Mike Wright
  2011-06-29  7:25   ` Ian Campbell
@ 2011-06-29 14:54   ` Mike Wright
  2011-06-30 15:01     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Wright @ 2011-06-29 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olivier B.; +Cc: xen-devel

On 06/28/2011 04:06 PM, Olivier B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which
> doesn't exists under Xen PV.
> See the Debian report about that :
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183
>
> Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but
> which distribution are you using ?

Follow up:

I checked and on fedora 14 there exists /proc/irq/0.  Distributed 
version is irqbalance-0.56-1.

Perhaps the segfault is a result of something else?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: irqbalance segfaults
  2011-06-29 14:54   ` Mike Wright
@ 2011-06-30 15:01     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2011-06-30 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Wright; +Cc: Olivier B., xen-devel

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:54:00AM -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 04:06 PM, Olivier B. wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >it's an irqbalance bug, because of the directory /proc/irq/0 which
> >doesn't exists under Xen PV.
> >See the Debian report about that :
> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517183
> >
> >Ana will package the fix soon for Debian Squeeze (backports ?), but
> >which distribution are you using ?
> 
> Follow up:
> 
> I checked and on fedora 14 there exists /proc/irq/0.  Distributed

When you boot it under Xen? Hm, can you provide the /proc/interrupts contents?

> version is irqbalance-0.56-1.
> 
> Perhaps the segfault is a result of something else?

Could be. Did you try the patch that was attached to the bugzilla?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-30 15:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-28 22:45 irqbalance segfaults Mike Wright
2011-06-28 23:06 ` Olivier B.
2011-06-28 23:16   ` Mike Wright
2011-06-29  7:25   ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-29 14:54   ` Mike Wright
2011-06-30 15:01     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.