From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slow performance on disk/network i/o full speed after drop_caches
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:03:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826030313.GA24058@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E570AEB.1040703@profihost.ag>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:54:35AM +0800, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> > Ah you are running an older kernel that didn't show all the vmstat
> > numbers. But still it's revealing that node 0 is used heavily and node
> > 1 is almost idle. So I won't be surprised to see most free pages lie
> > in node 1.
> I'm running a 2.6.38 kernel.
>
> There is at least a numastat proc file.
Thanks. This shows that node0 is accessed 10x more than node1.
> grep . /sys/devices/system/node/node*/numastat
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_hit 5958586
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_miss 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_foreign 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:interleave_hit 4191
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:local_node 5885189
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:other_node 73397
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_hit 488922
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_miss 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_foreign 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:interleave_hit 4187
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:local_node 386741
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:other_node 102181
>
> >> modified it a little bit:
> >> ~# while [ true ]; do ps -eo
> >> user,pid,tid,class,rtprio,ni,pri,psr,pcpu,vsz,rss,pmem,stat,wchan:28,cmd
> >> | grep scp | grep -v grep; sleep 1; done
> >>
> >> root 12409 12409 TS - 0 19 0 59.8 42136 1724 0.0 Ss
> >> poll_schedule_timeout scp -t /tmp/
> >
> > It's mostly doing poll() waits. There must be some dependency on
> > something other to make progress. Would you post the full ps output
> > for all tasks, and even better, run
> complete ps output:
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=b948svzN
In that log, scp happens to be in R state and also no other tasks in D
state. Would you retry in the hope of catching some stucked state?
> > echo t> /proc/sysrq-trigger
> sadly i wa sonly able to grab the output in this crazy format:
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MBXvvyH1
It's pretty readable dmesg, except that the data is incomplete and
there are nothing valuable in the uploaded portion..
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slow performance on disk/network i/o full speed after drop_caches
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:03:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826030313.GA24058@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E570AEB.1040703@profihost.ag>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:54:35AM +0800, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> > Ah you are running an older kernel that didn't show all the vmstat
> > numbers. But still it's revealing that node 0 is used heavily and node
> > 1 is almost idle. So I won't be surprised to see most free pages lie
> > in node 1.
> I'm running a 2.6.38 kernel.
>
> There is at least a numastat proc file.
Thanks. This shows that node0 is accessed 10x more than node1.
> grep . /sys/devices/system/node/node*/numastat
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_hit 5958586
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_miss 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:numa_foreign 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:interleave_hit 4191
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:local_node 5885189
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat:other_node 73397
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_hit 488922
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_miss 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:numa_foreign 0
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:interleave_hit 4187
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:local_node 386741
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat:other_node 102181
>
> >> modified it a little bit:
> >> ~# while [ true ]; do ps -eo
> >> user,pid,tid,class,rtprio,ni,pri,psr,pcpu,vsz,rss,pmem,stat,wchan:28,cmd
> >> | grep scp | grep -v grep; sleep 1; done
> >>
> >> root 12409 12409 TS - 0 19 0 59.8 42136 1724 0.0 Ss
> >> poll_schedule_timeout scp -t /tmp/
> >
> > It's mostly doing poll() waits. There must be some dependency on
> > something other to make progress. Would you post the full ps output
> > for all tasks, and even better, run
> complete ps output:
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=b948svzN
In that log, scp happens to be in R state and also no other tasks in D
state. Would you retry in the hope of catching some stucked state?
> > echo t> /proc/sysrq-trigger
> sadly i wa sonly able to grab the output in this crazy format:
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MBXvvyH1
It's pretty readable dmesg, except that the data is incomplete and
there are nothing valuable in the uploaded portion..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-26 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 6:06 slow performance on disk/network i/o full speed after drop_caches Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-24 6:20 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-24 6:20 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-24 9:01 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-24 9:01 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-24 9:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 9:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-25 9:00 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-25 9:00 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-26 2:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 2:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 2:54 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-26 2:54 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-26 3:03 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-26 3:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 3:13 ` Stefan Priebe
2011-08-26 3:13 ` Stefan Priebe
2011-08-26 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 3:30 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-08-26 3:30 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-08-26 6:18 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-26 6:18 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-31 7:11 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-08-31 7:11 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-09-01 4:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-01 4:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-01 5:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-09-01 5:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-09-01 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-01 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-24 9:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 9:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 9:32 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110826030313.GA24058@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.