* Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work()
@ 2011-10-31 13:01 Konstantin Belousov
2011-10-31 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Belousov @ 2011-10-31 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Packard; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
I have a question about ironlake_panel_vdd_work(). Should it use
the device struct_mutex, or need it to be the mode_config.mutex
instead ?
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 196 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work()
2011-10-31 13:01 Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work() Konstantin Belousov
@ 2011-10-31 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-31 18:33 ` Keith Packard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2011-10-31 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Belousov; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> I have a question about ironlake_panel_vdd_work(). Should it use
> the device struct_mutex, or need it to be the mode_config.mutex
> instead ?
Yeah. This was actually flagged in review by Chris and me, but seems to
have been lost in the merge. Keith?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work()
2011-10-31 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2011-10-31 18:33 ` Keith Packard
2011-10-31 20:55 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keith Packard @ 2011-10-31 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Konstantin Belousov; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1657 bytes --]
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:34:46 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > I have a question about ironlake_panel_vdd_work(). Should it use
> > the device struct_mutex, or need it to be the mode_config.mutex
> > instead ?
>
> Yeah. This was actually flagged in review by Chris and me, but seems to
> have been lost in the merge. Keith?
I thought I fixed that; it must have gotten lost in the fairly steady
set of rebasing/reworking of that patch sequence.
commit 241dedda2785f040da45576418686490431232d2
Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Date: Mon Oct 31 11:30:10 2011 -0700
drm/i915: Use mode_config.mutex in ironlake_panel_vdd_work
Use of the struct_mutex is not correct for locking in mode setting paths.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 6611d90..30420c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -971,9 +971,9 @@ static void ironlake_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work)
struct intel_dp, panel_vdd_work);
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp->base.base.dev;
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
ironlake_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
}
static void ironlake_edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
--
keith.packard@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work()
2011-10-31 18:33 ` Keith Packard
@ 2011-10-31 20:55 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2011-10-31 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Packard; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:34:46 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > I have a question about ironlake_panel_vdd_work(). Should it use
> > > the device struct_mutex, or need it to be the mode_config.mutex
> > > instead ?
> >
> > Yeah. This was actually flagged in review by Chris and me, but seems to
> > have been lost in the merge. Keith?
>
> I thought I fixed that; it must have gotten lost in the fairly steady
> set of rebasing/reworking of that patch sequence.
Yeah, I recall having seen a fixed version somewhere ...
> commit 241dedda2785f040da45576418686490431232d2
> Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 31 11:30:10 2011 -0700
>
> drm/i915: Use mode_config.mutex in ironlake_panel_vdd_work
>
> Use of the struct_mutex is not correct for locking in mode setting paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-31 20:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-31 13:01 Lock in the ironlake_panel_vdd_work() Konstantin Belousov
2011-10-31 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-31 18:33 ` Keith Packard
2011-10-31 20:55 ` Daniel Vetter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.