All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:06:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201190642.GW31337@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112011954.18258.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>

* Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 10:19]:
> On Thursday 01 of December 2011 at 19:22:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 01:35]:
> > > On Wednesday 30 of November 2011 at 23:28:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > We should also now be able to remove all the CONFIG_OMAP_ARM_XXXMHZ options
> > > > too, right?
> > > 
> > > Right, but then, perhaps the initial version of patch 2a/5, which 
> > > already started removing them, from omap1_defconfig for now, then going 
> > > into the right direction while unblocking another regression fix (3/5), 
> > > _is_ a good candidate for an rc fix?
> > 
> > But we did not allow dpll1 reprogramming earlier either,
> 
> Wrong. Without OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER selected, we always did, 
> but only once, early at boot, before ck_dpll1_p->rate was set first from 
> omap1_clk_init(), and never retried later, that's why that check which I 
> removed with 3/5 was never in the game until e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408.

Yeah you're right. You found what caused the regression :)
 
> > so we should
> > not need to make all these changes during the -rc cycle. I'm suspecting
> > that we've had this same behaviour for a really long time, and we just
> > have not seen it as omap1_defconfig had OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER
> > option set.
> > 
> > So I'm baffled how your board would be booting at a different rate
> > compared to v3.1, it seems that the logic has not changed there. Or
> > else we have some simple bug somewhere.
> > 
> > Care to try to verify at what point your system started booting at
> > 60MHz rate?
> 
> Since e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408, I guess, and it's hard 
> to confirm wituout bisecting the issue with too early sram call, back 
> until things still worked like before map_io related changes. I will do 
> that if you decide we should try to revert.

No need to bisect, I think we can just reset ck_dpll1_p->rate for
systems booting at below 60MHz rate to force the reprogramming.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:06:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111201190642.GW31337@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112011954.18258.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>

* Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 10:19]:
> On Thursday 01 of December 2011 at 19:22:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [111201 01:35]:
> > > On Wednesday 30 of November 2011 at 23:28:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > We should also now be able to remove all the CONFIG_OMAP_ARM_XXXMHZ options
> > > > too, right?
> > > 
> > > Right, but then, perhaps the initial version of patch 2a/5, which 
> > > already started removing them, from omap1_defconfig for now, then going 
> > > into the right direction while unblocking another regression fix (3/5), 
> > > _is_ a good candidate for an rc fix?
> > 
> > But we did not allow dpll1 reprogramming earlier either,
> 
> Wrong. Without OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER selected, we always did, 
> but only once, early at boot, before ck_dpll1_p->rate was set first from 
> omap1_clk_init(), and never retried later, that's why that check which I 
> removed with 3/5 was never in the game until e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408.

Yeah you're right. You found what caused the regression :)
 
> > so we should
> > not need to make all these changes during the -rc cycle. I'm suspecting
> > that we've had this same behaviour for a really long time, and we just
> > have not seen it as omap1_defconfig had OMAP_CLOCKS_SET_BY_BOOTLOADER
> > option set.
> > 
> > So I'm baffled how your board would be booting at a different rate
> > compared to v3.1, it seems that the logic has not changed there. Or
> > else we have some simple bug somewhere.
> > 
> > Care to try to verify at what point your system started booting at
> > 60MHz rate?
> 
> Since e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408, I guess, and it's hard 
> to confirm wituout bisecting the issue with too early sram call, back 
> until things still worked like before map_io related changes. I will do 
> that if you decide we should try to revert.

No need to bisect, I think we can just reset ck_dpll1_p->rate for
systems booting at below 60MHz rate to force the reprogramming.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-27  3:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:45   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-28 17:45     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-28 22:00     ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 22:00       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:32       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-30 22:32         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-30 20:57     ` [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 20:57       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:28       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-30 22:28         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 10:10         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 10:10           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 18:22           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:22             ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:54             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 18:54               ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:06               ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-12-01 19:06                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-04 12:17         ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Move dpll1 rates selection from config to runtime Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-04 12:17           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-08 23:13           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-08 23:13             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  1:51             ` [PATCH v2] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  1:51               ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  2:09               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-09  2:09                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-09  2:31                 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  2:31                   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  1:51       ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Set the omap1623 sram size to 16K Tony Lindgren
2011-12-09  1:51         ` Tony Lindgren
     [not found]     ` <201112010310.43890.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
     [not found]       ` <20111201022750.GY13928@atomide.com>
2011-12-01  9:54         ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01  9:54           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 10:21           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 10:21             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 17:17           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 17:17             ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:38             ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 18:38               ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:04               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 19:04                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 19:23                 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:23                   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:46                   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 19:46                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 20:30                     ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:30                       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 21:16                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP1: Update dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 21:16                       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-02  2:09                     ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Tony Lindgren
2011-12-02  2:09                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-02 17:02                       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-02 17:02                         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13                     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-04 15:07                 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Always reprogramme dpll1 rate at boot Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-04 15:07                   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming not actually allowed Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:46   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-28 17:46     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] init/calibrate.c: allow for recalibration of loops per jiffy Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 15:39   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-28 15:39     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-28 22:30     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 22:30       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP1: recalibrate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27  3:32   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-29  0:25   ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-29  0:25     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09  8:42     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-09  8:42       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-09 10:00       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 10:00         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 10:09         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 10:09           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-10  0:25         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-10  0:25           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-10 12:04           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-10 12:04             ` Janusz Krzysztofik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111201190642.GW31337@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.