All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:22:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112120922.13633.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m28vmi7ip3.fsf@igel.home>

On Monday 12 December 2011, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu)
>                 /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
>                 iowait = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.iowait;
>         else
> -               iowait = nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * iowait_time);
> +               iowait = jiffies64_to_cputime64(nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * iowait_time));
>  
>         return iowait;

Hmm, shouldn't this be using nsecs_to_cputime64()? For some reason however, that function
is (incorrectly?) defined as 

include/asm-generic/cputime.h:#define nsecs_to_cputime64(__ct)  nsecs_to_jiffies64(__ct)

and only used in one place, in

kernel/sched.c: if (cputime64_gt(nsecs_to_cputime64(latest_ns), cpustat->irq))
kernel/sched.c: if (cputime64_gt(nsecs_to_cputime64(latest_ns), cpustat->softirq))

I'm not sure what the correct solution is, but I would assume that ia64 and powerpc
should fix their definitions of nsecs_to_cputime64() anyway.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-12  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <m28vmi7ip3.fsf@igel.home>
2011-12-12  8:16 ` [PATCH] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t Michal Hocko
2011-12-12  9:22 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-12-12 10:17   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 11:51   ` [PATCH v2] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 12:43     ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-12 13:07       ` [PATCH v3] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 13:12         ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 10:03           ` [resend PATCH for 3.2] " Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 19:43             ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 19:59             ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 23:50               ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:56                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  0:14                   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22  0:19                     ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 10:18                       ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:55               ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:59                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  0:20                   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22  9:55               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-22 10:19               ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201112120922.13633.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=t.artem@mailcity.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.