From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [resend PATCH for 3.2] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:19:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221161944.ec1c49f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2zkelo428.fsf@igel.home>
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:14:39 +0100
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > a) what effect does this problem have upon users of the kernel?
>
> get_idle_time returns the value in the wrong unit.
So the "idle" fields in /proc/stat are wrong.
We're getting there! Now, in what way are they wrong? How could a
kernel maintainer recognise that this patch is needed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m28vmi7ip3.fsf@igel.home>
2011-12-12 8:16 ` [PATCH] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t Michal Hocko
2011-12-12 9:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-12 10:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 12:43 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-12 13:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 13:12 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 10:03 ` [resend PATCH for 3.2] " Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 23:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 0:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22 0:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-12-22 10:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 0:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22 9:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-22 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111221161944.ec1c49f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=t.artem@mailcity.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.