From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:17:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2wra2f61p.fsf@igel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112120922.13633.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:22:13 +0000")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Monday 12 December 2011, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu)
>> /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
>> iowait = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.iowait;
>> else
>> - iowait = nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * iowait_time);
>> + iowait = jiffies64_to_cputime64(nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * iowait_time));
>>
>> return iowait;
>
> Hmm, shouldn't this be using nsecs_to_cputime64()? For some reason however, that function
> is (incorrectly?) defined as
>
> include/asm-generic/cputime.h:#define nsecs_to_cputime64(__ct) nsecs_to_jiffies64(__ct)
>
> and only used in one place, in
>
> kernel/sched.c: if (cputime64_gt(nsecs_to_cputime64(latest_ns), cpustat->irq))
> kernel/sched.c: if (cputime64_gt(nsecs_to_cputime64(latest_ns), cpustat->softirq))
>
> I'm not sure what the correct solution is, but I would assume that ia64 and powerpc
> should fix their definitions of nsecs_to_cputime64() anyway.
There is no definition of nsecs_to_cputime64 on ia64/powerpc64 with
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING yet, probably because
CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is x86-only.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m28vmi7ip3.fsf@igel.home>
2011-12-12 8:16 ` [PATCH] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t Michal Hocko
2011-12-12 9:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-12 10:17 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2011-12-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 12:43 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-12 13:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Andreas Schwab
2011-12-12 13:12 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 10:03 ` [resend PATCH for 3.2] " Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 23:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 0:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 10:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-21 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 0:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-12-22 9:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-12-22 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2wra2f61p.fsf@igel.home \
--to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=t.artem@mailcity.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.