From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"d.hatayama" <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:18:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217201842.GP9751@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOkKT21zhyMwMmbR9WTipk5e=y_qMZ8ByG=njatjKbFLZW+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> A few days ago I investigted the case where system is reseted due to
> triple fault caused by the NMI after idt is disabled in
> machine_kexec. I didn't see the reset when trigering the kdump with
> NMI since the NMI is masked until next iret instruction executed as
> described in 6.7.2. Handling Multiple NMIs of Intel Manual Vol.3A.
> The NMI mask remains untill the first iret execution on the 2nd
> kernel: just the return path of the first kernel_thread invocation for
> init process. The exact path is:
hmm. So even though the local apic was disabled you still got an NMI?
That could have been from an external NMI. I forget how that is wired up,
if it goes through the IOAPIC to the Local APIC or directly to the NMI pin
on the cpu.
>
> switch_to
> -> ret_from_fork
> -> int_ret_from_sys_call
> -> retint_restore_args
> -> irq_return
>
> At that phase idt is already set up and kdump works.
>
> From the discussion I interpret kdump doesn't assume this behaviour,
> right?
probably not.
>
> BTW, does anyone know the detail of the NMI mask? I couldn't figure
> out about it from the Intel spec more than ``certain hardware
> conditions''... I expect those who look at here are x86 NMI experts.
I don't understand the question.
Cheers,
Don
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
vgoyal@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
"d.hatayama" <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:18:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217201842.GP9751@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOkKT21zhyMwMmbR9WTipk5e=y_qMZ8ByG=njatjKbFLZW+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> A few days ago I investigted the case where system is reseted due to
> triple fault caused by the NMI after idt is disabled in
> machine_kexec. I didn't see the reset when trigering the kdump with
> NMI since the NMI is masked until next iret instruction executed as
> described in 6.7.2. Handling Multiple NMIs of Intel Manual Vol.3A.
> The NMI mask remains untill the first iret execution on the 2nd
> kernel: just the return path of the first kernel_thread invocation for
> init process. The exact path is:
hmm. So even though the local apic was disabled you still got an NMI?
That could have been from an external NMI. I forget how that is wired up,
if it goes through the IOAPIC to the Local APIC or directly to the NMI pin
on the cpu.
>
> switch_to
> -> ret_from_fork
> -> int_ret_from_sys_call
> -> retint_restore_args
> -> irq_return
>
> At that phase idt is already set up and kdump works.
>
> From the discussion I interpret kdump doesn't assume this behaviour,
> right?
probably not.
>
> BTW, does anyone know the detail of the NMI mask? I couldn't figure
> out about it from the Intel spec more than ``certain hardware
> conditions''... I expect those who look at here are x86 NMI experts.
I don't understand the question.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-11 23:09 [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path tip-bot for Don Zickus
2012-02-12 1:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 1:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 4:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 4:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 12:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-13 12:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-13 16:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 16:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 18:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 18:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 17:27 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 17:27 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:56 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:56 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 3:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 3:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 12:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 12:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 15:49 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-17 15:49 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-17 20:18 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2012-02-17 20:18 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 5:17 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-20 5:17 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-20 15:24 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 15:24 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 19:54 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 19:54 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-18 3:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-18 3:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-20 15:14 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 15:14 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-21 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-21 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-21 13:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-21 13:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-29 23:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-29 23:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-07 10:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:54 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] boot: add early NMI counter Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:56 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 6:00 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 6:00 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 4:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 4:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 16:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 16:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-09 9:31 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:31 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] boot: fortify early_idt_handlers definition Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:51 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] boot: ignore early NMIs Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:55 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] boot: add early NMI counter Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 10:01 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 20:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-09 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 5:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 5:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 6:14 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 6:14 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 13:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 13:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-13 2:11 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 2:11 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 13:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-13 13:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 0:43 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-15 0:43 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-13 1:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 1:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-12 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-07 15:50 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-07 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-08 1:29 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 1:29 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 0:59 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-09 0:59 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-09 2:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-09 2:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-12 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-13 15:28 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 15:28 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 22:12 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:12 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 2:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 2:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:41 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120217201842.GP9751@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=d.hatayama@gmail.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.