Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs

["Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>]

On 03/13/2012 05:16 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 01:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 03/12/2012 01:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> The basic problem is which source do we block this at?  How many
>>> sources are their?  And architecturally last I looked x86 no longer
>>> has a NMI disable EFI and similar systems want to get away without
>>> a CMOS legacy clock because designers so often get them wrong.
>>>
>> On all processors which have an LAPIC you can block all NMI sources at
>> the LAPIC.  I think it's safe to assume that if you don't have an LAPIC
>> -- an ancient system by now -- you have port 70h.
>>
> One thing: *disabling* the LAPIC will allow external NMIs coming in on
> LINT1 through, since the LAPIC in the disabled state tries to mimic the
> no-LAPIC configuration.  So I don't think you want to disable LAPIC as
> much as disable the interrupt vectors within.

Does this sound like a plan to get the ball rolling?:

1.- Merge Don's patch to disable the LAPIC in kdump reboot path (this
   fixes a real issue seen in the field, is a net win and certainly not a
   regression - indeed it makes the code simpler because the I/O
   APICs are left untouched).

2.- Merge my patch set to ignore early NMIs (this brings the behavior
   of the boot code in line with what we do in the rest of the kernel
   a we can avoid situations were a spurious NMI causes the kernel
   to halt). The early NMI handler is temporary and the final NMI
   handler installed shortly afterwards will take care of subsequent
   NMIs.

3.- Make sure that spurious NMIs (i.e. NMIs that for whatever reason
   could not be stopped at the source) received during the reboot
   path to the kdump kernel do not cause a triple fault or a system
   lockup. This is under testing.

4.- Identify all the NMI sources and keep them from reaching the CPU
   when it can be done in a race-free way.

Can we get 1 and 2 merged while we work on further improvements
(3 and 4)?

Thanks,
Fernando

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec