From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Don Zickus" <dzickus@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:16:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5E59AC.7090708@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5E56EB.1090807@zytor.com>
On 03/12/2012 01:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 01:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> The basic problem is which source do we block this at? How many
>> sources are their? And architecturally last I looked x86 no longer
>> has a NMI disable EFI and similar systems want to get away without
>> a CMOS legacy clock because designers so often get them wrong.
>>
>
> On all processors which have an LAPIC you can block all NMI sources at
> the LAPIC. I think it's safe to assume that if you don't have an LAPIC
> -- an ancient system by now -- you have port 70h.
>
One thing: *disabling* the LAPIC will allow external NMIs coming in on
LINT1 through, since the LAPIC in the disabled state tries to mimic the
no-LAPIC configuration. So I don't think you want to disable LAPIC as
much as disable the interrupt vectors within.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
"Don Zickus" <dzickus@redhat.com>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:16:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5E59AC.7090708@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5E56EB.1090807@zytor.com>
On 03/12/2012 01:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 01:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> The basic problem is which source do we block this at? How many
>> sources are their? And architecturally last I looked x86 no longer
>> has a NMI disable EFI and similar systems want to get away without
>> a CMOS legacy clock because designers so often get them wrong.
>>
>
> On all processors which have an LAPIC you can block all NMI sources at
> the LAPIC. I think it's safe to assume that if you don't have an LAPIC
> -- an ancient system by now -- you have port 70h.
>
One thing: *disabling* the LAPIC will allow external NMIs coming in on
LINT1 through, since the LAPIC in the disabled state tries to mimic the
no-LAPIC configuration. So I don't think you want to disable LAPIC as
much as disable the interrupt vectors within.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-11 23:09 [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path tip-bot for Don Zickus
2012-02-12 1:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 1:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 4:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-12 4:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 12:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-13 12:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-13 16:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 16:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 18:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 18:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 17:27 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 17:27 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:56 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:56 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 3:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 3:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 12:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 12:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-17 15:49 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-17 15:49 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-17 20:18 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 20:18 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 5:17 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-20 5:17 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-02-20 15:24 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 15:24 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 19:54 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-17 19:54 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-18 3:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-18 3:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-20 15:14 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 15:14 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-21 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-21 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-21 13:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-21 13:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-29 23:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-29 23:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-07 10:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:54 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] boot: add early NMI counter Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-07 10:56 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 6:00 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 6:00 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 4:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 4:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 16:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-08 16:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-09 9:31 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:31 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] boot: fortify early_idt_handlers definition Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:51 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] boot: ignore early NMIs Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 9:55 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] boot: add early NMI counter Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 10:01 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 20:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-09 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 5:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 5:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 6:14 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 6:14 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 13:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 13:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-12 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-03-12 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-13 2:11 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 2:11 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 13:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-13 13:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 0:43 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-15 0:43 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-13 1:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-13 1:43 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-12 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-12 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-07 15:50 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-07 18:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-08 1:29 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-08 1:29 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2012-03-09 0:59 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-09 0:59 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-09 2:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-09 2:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-12 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-12 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-13 15:28 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 15:28 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-13 22:12 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:12 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 2:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 2:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-16 21:41 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-16 21:41 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5E59AC.7090708@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.