From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] blk: use correct sectors limitation for discard request
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:00:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313160024.GH29169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120312031306.030156009@fusionio.com>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:19AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> max_discard_sectors doesn't equal to max_sectors/max_hw_sectors. Without this,
> discard request merge might be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 9 +++++++--
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/block/blk-merge.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/block/blk-merge.c 2012-03-09 14:05:35.562062857 +0800
> +++ linux/block/blk-merge.c 2012-03-09 14:07:55.432062246 +0800
> @@ -228,13 +228,16 @@ no_merge:
> int ll_back_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
> struct bio *bio)
> {
> - unsigned short max_sectors;
> + unsigned int max_sectors;
>
> if (unlikely(req->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC))
> max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(q);
> else
> max_sectors = queue_max_sectors(q);
>
> + if (unlikely(req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD))
> + max_sectors = queue_max_discard_sectors(q);
> +
May be make above check an "else if" condition above instead of starting
another "if" block.
Thanks
Vivek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] blk: use correct sectors limitation for discard request
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:00:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313160024.GH29169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120312031306.030156009@fusionio.com>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:19AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> max_discard_sectors doesn't equal to max_sectors/max_hw_sectors. Without this,
> discard request merge might be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 9 +++++++--
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/block/blk-merge.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/block/blk-merge.c 2012-03-09 14:05:35.562062857 +0800
> +++ linux/block/blk-merge.c 2012-03-09 14:07:55.432062246 +0800
> @@ -228,13 +228,16 @@ no_merge:
> int ll_back_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
> struct bio *bio)
> {
> - unsigned short max_sectors;
> + unsigned int max_sectors;
>
> if (unlikely(req->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC))
> max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(q);
> else
> max_sectors = queue_max_sectors(q);
>
> + if (unlikely(req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD))
> + max_sectors = queue_max_discard_sectors(q);
> +
May be make above check an "else if" condition above instead of starting
another "if" block.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 3:04 [patch 0/7] Add TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10 Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 1/7] block: makes bio_split support bio without data Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 2/7] md: linear supports TRIM Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 3/7] md: raid 0 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 4/7] md: raid 1 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 5/7] md: raid 10 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 15:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 15:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 17:04 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-03-13 17:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 17:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 7/7] blk: use correct sectors limitation for discard request Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 16:00 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-13 16:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 3:18 ` [patch 0/7] Add TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10 Roberto Spadim
2012-03-12 3:18 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-03-12 18:22 ` Holger Kiehl
[not found] ` <4F5EFEB6.4060402@kernel.org>
2012-03-13 12:22 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-13 14:15 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 14:15 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 14:58 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-03-13 14:58 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-03-13 15:44 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 1:30 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 10:25 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 11:14 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 11:14 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 11:32 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 21:01 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 21:13 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-15 2:39 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-15 9:08 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-16 2:19 ` Shaohua Li
[not found] ` <4F5EA8E9.5010502@fusionio.com>
2012-03-14 2:25 ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 2:25 ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 2:24 ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 2:47 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-17 18:14 ` Mark Lord
2012-03-18 2:03 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313160024.GH29169@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.