All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, niklas.hernaeus@linaro.org,
	cjb@laptop.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] MMC: mmci: Seperate ARM variants from generic code
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:30:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120317213022.GE3315@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203161248.15490.arnd@arndb.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 758 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:48:15PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> > We _do_ need a solution for GPIO-controlled voltage regulators, as these
> > are actually quite common - see the various soc-common using PCMCIA
> > drivers.

> > So I think actually a bit more thought is required here, and there's a
> > need to use some of the facilities such as regulator which are now present
> > that weren't when the driver was originally written some 9 years ago.

> Ok. Let's see what Mark has to say about this.

There's the gpio-regulator driver in mainline which should be able to
support a fairly wide range of these simple regulators, and also the
fixed voltage regulator for extremely simple cases.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] MMC: mmci: Seperate ARM variants from generic code
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:30:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120317213022.GE3315@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203161248.15490.arnd@arndb.de>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:48:15PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> > We _do_ need a solution for GPIO-controlled voltage regulators, as these
> > are actually quite common - see the various soc-common using PCMCIA
> > drivers.

> > So I think actually a bit more thought is required here, and there's a
> > need to use some of the facilities such as regulator which are now present
> > that weren't when the driver was originally written some 9 years ago.

> Ok. Let's see what Mark has to say about this.

There's the gpio-regulator driver in mainline which should be able to
support a fairly wide range of these simple regulators, and also the
fixed voltage regulator for extremely simple cases.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120317/90d2d093/attachment-0001.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-17 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-14 14:19 [PATCH 0/5] MMC: mmci: Provide bindings for Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] MMC: mmci: Seperate ux500 variants from generic code Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:19   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] MMC: mmci: Seperate ARM " Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 17:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:32     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:36     ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 17:36       ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 17:37       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:37         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:46         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:46           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:54           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:54             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 18:23             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 18:23               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 20:30               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 20:30                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-16 12:48                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-16 12:48                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-17 21:30                   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-03-17 21:30                     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-15 17:38       ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 17:38         ` Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] MMC: mmci: Add generic Device Tree bindings to mmci core code Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 15:12   ` Per Forlin
2012-03-15 15:12     ` Per Forlin
2012-03-15 15:25     ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 15:25       ` Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] MMC: mmci: Add required documentation for Device Tree bindings Lee Jones
2012-03-14 14:20   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 17:35   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:35     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:49     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:58         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:53   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:53     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 17:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 17:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] MMC: mmci: Provide bindings for Device Tree Per Forlin
2012-03-15 15:06   ` Per Forlin
2012-03-15 15:25   ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 15:25     ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 15:32     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 15:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 15:44       ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 15:44         ` Lee Jones
2012-03-15 19:12       ` Per Forlin
2012-03-15 19:12         ` Per Forlin
2012-03-15 20:36         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 20:36           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-15 20:58         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 20:58           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-16  9:01           ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-16  9:01             ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-16 12:36             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-16 12:36               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-17 21:26               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-17 21:26                 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120317213022.GE3315@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=niklas.hernaeus@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.