From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:27:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120324102751.GA29067@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120324102609.GA28356@lizard>
Many architctures clear tasks' mm_cpumask like this:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
The code above has several problems, such as:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
This patch implements a small helper function that does things
correctly, i.e.:
1. We take the task's lock while whe handle its mm (we can't use
get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep);
2. To catch exited main thread case, we use find_lock_task_mm(),
which walks up all threads and returns an appropriate task
(with task lock held).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1f65875..941e865 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 2060c6e..5255936 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
@@ -171,6 +172,23 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
+ task_unlock(t);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+}
+
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
--
1.7.9.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:27:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120324102751.GA29067@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120324102609.GA28356@lizard>
Many architctures clear tasks' mm_cpumask like this:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
The code above has several problems, such as:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
This patch implements a small helper function that does things
correctly, i.e.:
1. We take the task's lock while whe handle its mm (we can't use
get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep);
2. To catch exited main thread case, we use find_lock_task_mm(),
which walks up all threads and returns an appropriate task
(with task lock held).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1f65875..941e865 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 2060c6e..5255936 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
@@ -171,6 +172,23 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
+ task_unlock(t);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+}
+
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
--
1.7.9.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:27:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120324102751.GA29067@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120324102609.GA28356@lizard>
Many architctures clear tasks' mm_cpumask like this:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
The code above has several problems, such as:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
This patch implements a small helper function that does things
correctly, i.e.:
1. We take the task's lock while whe handle its mm (we can't use
get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep);
2. To catch exited main thread case, we use find_lock_task_mm(),
which walks up all threads and returns an appropriate task
(with task lock held).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1f65875..941e865 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 2060c6e..5255936 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
@@ -171,6 +172,23 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
+ task_unlock(t);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+}
+
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
--
1.7.9.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: anton.vorontsov@linaro.org (Anton Vorontsov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:27:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120324102751.GA29067@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120324102609.GA28356@lizard>
Many architctures clear tasks' mm_cpumask like this:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
The code above has several problems, such as:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
This patch implements a small helper function that does things
correctly, i.e.:
1. We take the task's lock while whe handle its mm (we can't use
get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep);
2. To catch exited main thread case, we use find_lock_task_mm(),
which walks up all threads and returns an appropriate task
(with task lock held).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1f65875..941e865 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 2060c6e..5255936 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
@@ -171,6 +172,23 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
+ task_unlock(t);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+}
+
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
--
1.7.9.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:27:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120324102751.GA29067@lizard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120324102609.GA28356@lizard>
Many architctures clear tasks' mm_cpumask like this:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
The code above has several problems, such as:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
This patch implements a small helper function that does things
correctly, i.e.:
1. We take the task's lock while whe handle its mm (we can't use
get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep);
2. To catch exited main thread case, we use find_lock_task_mm(),
which walks up all threads and returns an appropriate task
(with task lock held).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 1f65875..941e865 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ extern void put_online_cpus(void);
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) cpu_notifier(fn, pri)
#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) register_cpu_notifier(nb)
#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) unregister_cpu_notifier(nb)
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu);
int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 2060c6e..5255936 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
@@ -171,6 +172,23 @@ void __ref unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
+void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
+ task_unlock(t);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+}
+
static inline void check_for_tasks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *p;
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-24 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-24 10:26 [PATCH v2 0/10] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:26 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:27 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-03-24 10:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-26 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-28 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-24 10:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm: Use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] powerpc: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] sh: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:29 ` [PATCH 05/10] blackfin: A couple of task->mm handling fixes Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] blackfin: Fix possible deadlock in decode_address() Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] um: Fix possible race on task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 10:31 ` [PATCH 09/10] um: Properly check all process' threads for a live mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 11:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-03-24 10:31 ` [PATCH 10/10] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 10:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:21 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-24 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-28 7:20 ` David Rientjes
2012-03-28 7:20 ` David Rientjes
2012-03-28 7:20 ` David Rientjes
2012-03-28 7:20 ` David Rientjes
2012-03-28 7:20 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120324102751.GA29067@lizard \
--to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.