From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] GPMI-NAND: Define ecc.strength
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 04:40:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205210440.09310.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120521014121.GO5427@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Dear Shawn Guo,
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:36:41AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Shawn Guo,
> >
> > > So non-DT probe has the same issue? Or this is a DT probe only issue?
> >
> > I started using DT, so I'm now fixing everything to work like it used to.
> > Damn this DT conversion broke about everything.
>
> So you are saying the issue is introduced by gpmi-nand DT conversion?
I doubt so ... but noone ever could test it without DT bindings as you
NAKed/stalled every single attempt to add the platform binding code. So this
code was rotting in the tree, who knows how many bugs are still in it. Now I
guess it's about time to start squashing the bugs.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] GPMI-NAND: Define ecc.strength
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 04:40:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205210440.09310.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120521014121.GO5427@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Dear Shawn Guo,
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:36:41AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Shawn Guo,
> >
> > > So non-DT probe has the same issue? Or this is a DT probe only issue?
> >
> > I started using DT, so I'm now fixing everything to work like it used to.
> > Damn this DT conversion broke about everything.
>
> So you are saying the issue is introduced by gpmi-nand DT conversion?
I doubt so ... but noone ever could test it without DT bindings as you
NAKed/stalled every single attempt to add the platform binding code. So this
code was rotting in the tree, who knows how many bugs are still in it. Now I
guess it's about time to start squashing the bugs.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 1:02 [PATCH 1/4] GPMI-NAND: Define ecc.strength Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] GPMI-NAND: Fixup compile issue Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:16 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 1:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] MXS-MMC: Move of_match_table out of CONFIG_PM Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 4:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 4:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 3:52 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-21 3:52 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-21 4:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 4:33 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] MXS-MMC: Add wp-inverted property Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:39 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 1:39 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 2:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 2:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 2:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 2:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 3:22 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-21 3:22 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-21 3:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 7:22 ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-05-21 17:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] GPMI-NAND: Define ecc.strength Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 1:14 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 1:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 1:41 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 1:41 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 2:40 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-05-21 2:40 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:08 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-21 3:08 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-21 3:48 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:48 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:45 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 3:45 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-21 3:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 2:44 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-21 2:44 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-21 3:43 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-21 3:43 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205210440.09310.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.