All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:24:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF2EEA1.6080204@linaro.org>

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 03/07/12 13:35, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Do we really want to create MFD cells like this (which are really Linux
> >internal things and might vary if another OS or another version of Linux
> >changes its internal abstractions) from the device tree?

> We're not creating them. We're merely using current infrastructure.

*Very* recently added infrastructure which caused you to notice this...

> Before, when we probed each device from Device Tree we came up
> against some fairly major limitations of the Device Tree. As a
> result, Arnd and I agreed that this was the way to go.

I'm really unconvinced that instnatiating the MFD cells from device tree
is in general a good idea.

> See c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515 for a short description
> of the troubles we faced.

$ git show c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515
fatal: bad object c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120703/8cfced81/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:24:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF2EEA1.6080204@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 03/07/12 13:35, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Do we really want to create MFD cells like this (which are really Linux
> >internal things and might vary if another OS or another version of Linux
> >changes its internal abstractions) from the device tree?

> We're not creating them. We're merely using current infrastructure.

*Very* recently added infrastructure which caused you to notice this...

> Before, when we probed each device from Device Tree we came up
> against some fairly major limitations of the Device Tree. As a
> result, Arnd and I agreed that this was the way to go.

I'm really unconvinced that instnatiating the MFD cells from device tree
is in general a good idea.

> See c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515 for a short description
> of the troubles we faced.

$ git show c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515
fatal: bad object c5395e7ed8f16cc7bb72a783de68659db5aed515

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-03 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 11:59 [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration Lee Jones
2012-07-03 11:59 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 12:35   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:07   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:07     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:24     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-07-03 13:24       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:48       ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:48         ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:21         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 14:21           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05  7:36           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05  7:36             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05  9:45             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05  9:45               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 11:46               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 11:46                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:06                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:06                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:15                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:15                     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:29                     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:29                       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:41                       ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:41                         ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:45                         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:45                           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:55                           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:55                             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:03                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:03                               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:12                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:12                                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:20                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:20                                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:54                                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:54                                     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:57                                     ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:57                                       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06                                 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-05 14:06                                   ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-05 13:57                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 13:57                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:04                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:04                               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06                             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:06                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:13                               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:13                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:35                                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:35                                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 15:41                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:41                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:51                                     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 15:51                                       ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:01       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 14:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 14:43         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 14:43           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05  7:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05  7:33   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-05 13:08   ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-05 13:13   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:13     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.