From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:41:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207051541.52261.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF5A61F.2050400@linaro.org>
On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On 05/07/12 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >>> The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
> >>> it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
> >>> we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
> >>> DT and the non-DT case.
> >
> >> Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?
> >
> >> If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
> >> code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for both DT
> >> and !DT.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!
>
> Well it seems silly of me just to copy Arnd's work. Do you want to
> author and submit the patch to do this Arnd?
No, just assume ownership of it. I haven't tried building the
patch, so I assume you will have to change it some more. Just
list me as Suggested-by:.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:41:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207051541.52261.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF5A61F.2050400@linaro.org>
On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On 05/07/12 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >>> The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
> >>> it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
> >>> we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
> >>> DT and the non-DT case.
> >
> >> Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?
> >
> >> If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
> >> code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for both DT
> >> and !DT.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!
>
> Well it seems silly of me just to copy Arnd's work. Do you want to
> author and submit the patch to do this Arnd?
No, just assume ownership of it. I haven't tried building the
patch, so I assume you will have to change it some more. Just
list me as Suggested-by:.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 11:59 [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration Lee Jones
2012-07-03 11:59 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:07 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:07 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:24 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 14:21 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 7:36 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 7:36 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 9:45 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 9:45 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 11:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 11:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:29 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:29 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:41 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:41 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:45 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:45 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 12:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 12:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:12 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:12 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:54 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:54 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-05 14:06 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-05 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:06 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:06 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 14:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 14:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-07-05 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-03 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-03 14:43 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-03 14:43 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-05 7:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 7:33 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-05 13:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-07-05 13:13 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-05 13:13 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207051541.52261.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.