All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:33:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802133310.GD29814@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120802123658.GA5194@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 02-08-12 08:37:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:19:34AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > On the other hand, mine is more coupled with the sharing code so it
> > > makes the code easier to follow and also makes the sharing more
> > > effective because racing processes see pmd populated when checking for
> > > shareable mappings.
> > > 
> > 
> > It could do with a small comment above huge_pmd_share() explaining that
> > calling pmd_alloc() under the i_mmap_mutex is necessary to prevent two
> > parallel faults missing a sharing opportunity with each other but it's
> > not mandatory.
> 
> Sure, that's a good idea. What about the following:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 40b2500..51839d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,13 @@ static int vma_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb.
> + * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb. In any case calls
> + * pmd_alloc and returns the corresponding pte. While this not necessary
> + * for the !shared pmd case because we can allocate the pmd later as
> + * well it makes the code much cleaner. pmd allocation is essential for
> + * the shared case though because pud has to be populated inside the
> + * same i_mmap_mutex section otherwise racing tasks could either miss
> + * the sharing (see huge_pte_offset) or selected a bad pmd for sharing.
>   */
>  static pte_t*
>  huge_pmd_share(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pud_t *pud)
> 

Looks reasonable to me.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -alternative] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:33:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802133310.GD29814@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120802123658.GA5194@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 02-08-12 08:37:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:19:34AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > On the other hand, mine is more coupled with the sharing code so it
> > > makes the code easier to follow and also makes the sharing more
> > > effective because racing processes see pmd populated when checking for
> > > shareable mappings.
> > > 
> > 
> > It could do with a small comment above huge_pmd_share() explaining that
> > calling pmd_alloc() under the i_mmap_mutex is necessary to prevent two
> > parallel faults missing a sharing opportunity with each other but it's
> > not mandatory.
> 
> Sure, that's a good idea. What about the following:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 40b2500..51839d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,13 @@ static int vma_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb.
> + * search for a shareable pmd page for hugetlb. In any case calls
> + * pmd_alloc and returns the corresponding pte. While this not necessary
> + * for the !shared pmd case because we can allocate the pmd later as
> + * well it makes the code much cleaner. pmd allocation is essential for
> + * the shared case though because pud has to be populated inside the
> + * same i_mmap_mutex section otherwise racing tasks could either miss
> + * the sharing (see huge_pte_offset) or selected a bad pmd for sharing.
>   */
>  static pte_t*
>  huge_pmd_share(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pud_t *pud)
> 

Looks reasonable to me.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-02 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 13:49 [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables v2 Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 13:49 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:11 ` [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables V2 (resend) Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:11   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:29   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:29     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:37     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:37       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:40       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:40         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:36   ` [PATCH -alternative] " Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:36     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 14:51     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-20 14:51       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23  4:04       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23  4:04         ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23 11:40         ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 11:40           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24  1:08           ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24  1:08             ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24  8:32             ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24  8:32               ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24  9:34               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-24 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24 10:04                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-24 19:23               ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-24 19:23                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-25  8:36                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-25  8:36                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 17:42         ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 17:42           ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:04           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 18:04             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  8:42           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:42             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 18:37         ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:37           ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:03           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 21:03             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  3:48           ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  3:48             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:10             ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:10               ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:23             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27 10:23               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27 10:36               ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27 10:36                 ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-30 19:11               ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-30 19:11                 ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 12:16                 ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-31 12:16                   ` Hillf Danton
2012-07-31 12:46                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 12:46                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:07                   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 13:07                     ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 13:29                     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:29                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-31 13:21                   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 13:21                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 17:49                   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 17:49                     ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 20:06                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 20:06                       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 20:57                       ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-31 20:57                         ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  2:45                       ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  2:45                         ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01  8:20                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01  8:20                           ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 12:32                           ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 12:32                             ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 15:06                             ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-01 15:06                               ` Larry Woodman
2012-08-02  7:19                               ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02  7:19                                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02  7:37                                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02  7:37                                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02 12:36                                   ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 12:36                                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 13:33                                     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-08-02 13:33                                       ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-02 13:53                                       ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-02 13:53                                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 18:03                   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-31 18:03                     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:31     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 18:31       ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27  9:02       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-27  9:02         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-26 16:01 ` [PATCH] mm: hugetlbfs: Close race during teardown of hugetlbfs shared page tables v2 Larry Woodman
2012-07-26 16:01   ` Larry Woodman
2012-07-27  8:47   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:47     ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-26 21:00 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:00   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-26 21:54   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-26 21:54     ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-27  8:52   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-27  8:52     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120802133310.GD29814@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.